green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.5 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1992 ·
…we reject argument that any requirement that he acknowledge personal responsibility in order to gain the benefit of the two-level reduction impermissibly prejudices his right to appeal his conviction.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Greg Davis, Aka: Greg David, United States of America v. Alfredo Chavaria-Casteneda, Aka: Alfredo Chavaria Casteneda, United States of America v. Robert Acevedes-Ramirez, Aka: Robert Aceves Ramirez, Aka: Robert Ramirez, United States of America v. Robert Acevedes-Ramirez, Aka: Robert Aceves Ramirez, Aka: Robert Ramirez, United States of America v. Moises Negron, Jr., United States of America v. Greg Davis, United States of America v. Alfredo Chavaria-Casteneda, Aka: Alfredo Chavaria Casteneda, United States of America v. Greg Davis, Aka: Greg David
we reject argument that any requirement that he acknowledge personal responsibility in order to gain the benefit of the two-level reduction impermissibly prejudices his right to appeal his conviction.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Davis
we reject argument that any requirement that he acknowledge personal responsibility in order to gain the benefit of the two-level reduction impermissibly prejudices his right to appeal his conviction.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles Odell Perrin
See United States v. Singleton, 902 F.2d 471, 472 (6th Cir.) (noting the infrequency with which a defense of justification is appropriate), cert. denied 498 U.S. 872 , 111 S.Ct. 196 , 112 L.Ed.2d 158 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Pedro H. Valdez, Wasang Tomas Mock, Jorge Garcia, and Raul Rodriguez
See United States v. Parker, 9 03 F.2d 91, 108 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 872 , 111 S.Ct. 196 , 112 L.Ed.2d 158 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rupert Gordon
(2×)
See United States v. Parker, 903 F.2d 91, 97 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 872 , 111 S.Ct. 196 , 112 L.Ed.2d 158 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Pedro Jose Cruz, Carlos Cepeda and Ramon Espinal
See United States v. Parker, 903 F.2d 91, 105 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 196 , 112 L.Ed.2d 158 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rivera
See United States v. Parker, 903 F.2d 91, 99 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-,-, 111 S.Ct. 196 , 201, 112 L.Ed.2d 158 (1990); Walker, 835 F.2d at 989.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rivera
See United States v. Parker, 903 F.2d 91, 99 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, ----, 111 S.Ct. 196 , 201, 112 L.Ed.2d 158 (1990); Walker, 835 F.2d at 989 . 42 Finally, Rivera argues that the prosecutors improperly imputed fear of the defendants to government witnesses.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard Skowronski
See United States v. Parker, 903 F.2d 91, 103 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 196 , 112 L.Ed.2d 158 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Hugo Lopez, Juan Trujillo and Hernando Vasquez
See United States v. Parker, 903 F.2d 91, 103-04 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 196 , 112 L.Ed.2d 158 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Richard Dale Talbott
Instead, some circuits have recognized it as a matter of common law. 2 See United States v. Elder, 16 F.3d 733, 738-39 (7th Cir.1994); see also United States v. Singleton, 902 F.2d 471, 472 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 872 , 111 S.Ct. 196 , 112 L.Ed.2d 158 (1990); United States v. Lemon, 824 F.2d 763, 765 (9th Cir.1987); United States v. Panter, 688 F.2d 268, 271 (5th Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Corcoran
The Second Circuit has stated that “[w]hether a prosecutor’s improper statement during summation results in a denial of due process depends upon whether the improper statement causes substantial prejudice to the defendant.” United States v. Nersesian, 824 F.2d 1294, 1327 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 957 , 108 S.Ct. 355 , 98 L.Ed.2d 380 (1987); see also United States v. Parker, 903 F.2d 91, 98 (2d Cir.) (requiring showing of substantial prejudice), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 872 , 111 S.Ct. 196 , 112 L.Ed.2d 158 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William v. Toney
The Third Circuit determined that the evidence supported the conclusion that the defendant acted under the reasonable belief that if he left the gun and fled he would be pursued and possibly shot. 951 F.2d at 543 ; compare United States v. Singleton, 902 F.2d 471, 473 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 872 , 111 S.Ct. 196 , 112 L.Ed.2d 158 (1990) (justification jury instruction unwarranted because the defendant, who took the gun from a threatening third party, failed to show that he did not maintain possession any longer than absolutely necessary).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Miguel Bautista and Tony Rodriguez Perez, Luis R. Minier-Contreras
See, e.g., United States v. Parker, 903 F.2d 91, 98 (2d Cir.) (prosecutor may not permissibly “suggest that the defendant has any burden of proof or any obligation to adduce any evidence whatever”), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 872 , 111 S.Ct. 196 , 112 L.Ed.2d 158 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Oscar Rosa, Vincent Lopez, Ricardo Rodriguez, Hector Hernandez, and Armando Velasquez
See, e.g., United States v. Parker, 903 F.2d 91, 97 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 872 , 111 S.Ct. 196 , 112 L.Ed.2d 158 (1990); United States v. Roman, 870 F.2d 65, 71 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1109 , 109 S.Ct. 3164 , 104 L.Ed.2d 1026 (1989).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Eisen
See, e.g., United States v. Parker, 903 F.2d 91, 96-97 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 196 , 112 L.Ed.2d 158 (1990).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Eisen
See, e.g., United States v. Parker, 903 F.2d 91, 96-97 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 196 , 112 L.Ed.2d 158 (1990).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Syed Shafi Imran
Id. at 1007; see also United States v. Parker, 903 F.2d 91, 103 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 196 , 112 L.Ed.2d 158 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Cecil Arnold Odom, A/K/A Bud Kelly
See, e.g., United States v. Parker, 903 F.2d 91, 103 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 111 S.Ct. 196 (1990); United States v. George, 568 F.2d 1064, 1072 (4th Cir.1978). 49 After the trial, Odom brought a motion for a new trial accompanied by McQuade's affidavit that she had been with Odom the night of the murder but had been afraid to testify at the trial because of threats from the FBI.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Joaquin Augusto Diaz and Jose Guillermo Guapacha
See, e.g., United States v. Parker, 903 F.2d 91, 103 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 196 , 112 L.Ed.2d 158 (1990).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Holloran
v.
Murray, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
v.
Murray, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
No. 90-5342.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1990.
Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (2)
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.