Delo v. Byrd, 498 U.S. 953 (1990). · Go Syfert
Search
Delo v. Byrd, 498 U.S. 953 (1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “We note that the general rule is that cross-motions for summary judgment do not obligate the Court to render summary judgment, rather the trial court's duty is to determine independently whether there are any genuine issues of material fact.”
6 citation events across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Eagle Industries, Inc. v. DeVilbiss Health Care, Inc. (del, 1997-11-25)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Eagle Industries, Inc. v. DeVilbiss Health Care, Inc.
Del. · 1997 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
we note that the general rule is that cross-motions for summary judgment do not obligate the court to render summary judgment, rather the trial court's duty is to determine independently whether there are any genuine issues of material fact.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Delo, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional Center
v.
Byrd
No. A-331.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 1, 1990.
498 U.S. 953
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 90%
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Delaware (1)

Application of the Attorney General of Missouri for an order to vacate the stay of execution of sentence of death entered by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, presented to Justice Kennedy, and by him referred to the Court, denied.