green
Positive treatment
4.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Paul H. Shield, MD, Inc. v. Northfield Laboratories Inc. (In re Northfield Laboratories Inc.)
See Wallis v. Justice Oaks II, Ltd., 898 F.2d 1544 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 959 , 111 S.Ct. 387 , 112 L.Ed.2d 398 (1990) (noting that plaintiffs’ adversary complaint that repeated plan objections was “an impermissible collateral attack on the order confirming the plan.
discussed
Cited "see"
O'BRIEN v. Federal Trust Bank, FSB
See In re Justice Oaks II, Ltd., 898 F.2d 1544 , 1551 (11th Cir.) ("[O]ne who participates in a chapter 11 plan confirmation proceeding becomes a party to that proceeding even if never formally named as such."), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 959 , 111 S.Ct. 387 , 112 L.Ed.2d 398 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Phelps v. Hamilton
See Sequoia Books, Inc. v. Ingemunson, 901 F.2d 630, 633 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 959 , 111 S.Ct. 387 , 112 L.Ed.2d 398 (1990); Entertainment Concepts, Inc., III v. Maciejewski, 631 F.2d at 500 ; cf. Virginia v. American Booksellers Assn., Inc., 484 U.S. 383, 392-93 , 108 S.Ct. 636, 642-43 , 98 L.Ed.2d 782 (1988) (Booksellers had standing to challenge state statute prohibiting display of sexual materials, because the statute was aimed directly at plaintiffs, they were required to comply with it or risk prosecution, .the State did not suggest that the statute would not be enforced, an…
cited
Cited "see"
Smith v. Shalala
See Sequoia Books, Inc. v. Ingemunson, 901 F.2d 630, 633 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 959 , 111 S.Ct. 387 , 112 L.Ed.2d 398 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Smith v. Shalala
See Sequoia Books, Inc. v. Ingemunson, 901 F.2d 630, 633 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 959 , 111 S.Ct. 387 , 112 L.Ed.2d 398 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Taylor v. Freeland (In Re Davis)
See In re Justice Oaks II, Ltd., 898 F.2d 1544 , 1549-50 n. 3 (11th Cir.), cert. den., 498 U.S. 959 , 111 S.Ct. 387 , 112 L.Ed.2d 398 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Adult Video Association, Doe, Inc., Roe, Inc., Paul Poe v. William Barr, Attorney General of the United States
See Sequoia Books, Inc. v. Ingemunson, 901 F.2d 630, 633-34 (7th Cir.) (court entertains pre-enforcement challenge to post-conviction forfeiture provision), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 387 , 112 L.Ed.2d 398 (1990); cf. Babbitt, 442 U.S. at 303 , 99 S.Ct. at 2311 (challenge to vagueness of criminal penalty provision).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Furlett
See Sequoia Books, Inc. v. Ingemunson, 901 F.2d 630, 639-40 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 387 , 112 L.Ed.2d 398 (1990). “[Ojnly the clearest proof that the purpose and effect of a civil provision are punitive will- suffice to override Congress’ manifest preference for a civil sanction.” United States v. WRW Corp., 731 F.Supp. 237, 238 (E.D.Ky.1989), citing 89 Firearms, 465 U.S. at 365 , 104 S.Ct. at 1106 .
cited
Cited "see"
Taylor v. Liberty National Life Insurance
See In re Justice Oaks II, Ltd., 898 F.2d 1544 , 1550 n. 3 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 387 , 112 L.Ed.2d 398 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sure-Snap Corp. v. Bradford National Bank
The elements of the doctrine have been summarized in this Circuit as follows: Res judicata “applies to preclude later litigation if the earlier decision was (1) a final judgment on the merits, (2) by a court of competent jurisdiction, (3) in a case involving the same parties or their privies, and (4) involving the same cause of action.” Teltronics Services, 762 F.2d at 190 ; accord In re Justice Oaks II, Ltd., 898 F.2d 1544 , 1550 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 387 , 112 L.Ed.2d 398 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
WCI Communities v. Wright (In re Lost Key Plantation Ltd. Partnership)
A plan is binding upon all parties once it is confirmed and “all questions that could have been raised pertaining to the plan are res judicata.” In re Grubbs Const. Co., 328 B.R. 873, 879 (Bankr.M.D.Fla.2005): In re Harloff, 247 B.R. 523 (Bankr.M.D.Fla.2000); see also, In re Justice Oaks II, Ltd. 898 F.2d 1544 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 959 , 111 S.Ct. 387 , 112 L.Ed.2d 398 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Puff 'N Stuff of Winter Park, Inc. v. Federal Trust Bank, F.S.B.
Corp., 904 F.2d 1498 , 1503 (11th Cir.1990) (quoting Ru *1530 pie v. City of Vermillion, S.D., 714 F.2d 860, 861 (8th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1029 , 104 S.Ct. 1290 , 79 L.Ed.2d 692 (1984)); see also In re Justice Oaks II, Ltd., 898 F.2d 1544 , 1551 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 959 , 111 S.Ct. 887 , 112 L.Ed.2d 398 (1990) (acknowledging Florida’s adoption of the “transactional” test set forth in Restatement (2d) of Judgments § 24 (1982)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brennan v. Lyon
See also In re Justice Oaks II, Ltd., 898 F.2d 1544 , 1551 (11th Cir.) (acknowledging Florida’s adoption of the “transactional” test in Restatement (2d) of Judgments § 24 (1982)), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 959 , 111 S.Ct. 387 , 112 L.Ed.2d 398 (1990); Signo v. Florida Farm Bureau Casualty Ins.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Atlantic Gulf Communities Corp. v. Tax Collectors of St. Lucie County (In re General Development Corp.)
The Confirmation Order and Reorganization Plan Under section 1141(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, a confirmed plan of reorganization is binding upon every entity with a prepetition claim against the debtor. 11 U.S.C. § 1141 (a) (1988); see also, In re Justice Oaks II, Ltd., 898 F.2d 1644 , 1560 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 959 , 111 S.Ct. 387 , 112 L.Ed.2d 398 (1990); In re Custom Arc Manufacturing, Inc., 125 B.R. 843, 844 (Bankr.M.D.Fla.1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
North Alabama Anesthesiology Group, P.C. v. Zickler (In Re North Alabama Anesthesiology Group, P.C.)
See also In re Justice Oaks II, Ltd., 898 F.2d 1544 , 1550 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 959 , 111 S.Ct. 387 , 112 L.Ed.2d 398 (1990) (bankruptcy court’s order confirming a reorganization plan entitled to res judicata effect); In re Pavlovich, 952 F.2d 114 (5th Cir.1992) (bankruptcy court’s order confirming a Chapter 11 reorganization plan is entitled to res judicata effect); In re McAfee, 120 B.R. 76, 80 (Bankr.N.D.Tex.1990) (creditor waived right to object to jurisdiction of bankruptcy court by failing to object and/or appeal the confirmation of the reorganization plan); Federal De…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jones v. Cage (W.J. Services, Inc.)
See, e.g., In re Justice Oaks II, Ltd., 898 F.2d 1544 , 1549 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 387 , 112 L.Ed.2d 398 (1990); In re A & C Properties, 784 F.2d 1377, 1381 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 854 , 107 S.Ct. 189 , 93 L.Ed.2d 122 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ronald O. Pelletier v. Gary D. Zweifel, Ronald O. Pelletier v. Gary D. Zweifel
For the purposes of claim preclusion, a court asks whether the plaintiff in the present suit is proceeding on the same cause of action as in the previous suit. “ ‘[I]f a case arises out of the same nucleus of operative fact, or is based upon the same factual predicate, as a former action, [then] the two cases are really the same “claim” or “cause of action” for purposes of res judicata.’ ” Id. (quoting Ruple v. City of Vermillion, 714 F.2d 860, 861 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1029 , 104 S.Ct. 1290 , 79 L.Ed.2d 692 (1984)); see also Wallis v. Justice Oaks II, Ltd., 89…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
601 Properties, Inc.
v.
City of Dayton, Ohio
v.
City of Dayton, Ohio
No. 90-481.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 5, 1990.
Published
Ct. App. Ohio, Montgomery County. Certiorari denied.