green
Positive treatment
6.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Parks v. United States
See Mitchell v. United States, 569 A.2d 177, 180 (D.C.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 986 , 111 S.Ct. 521 , 112 L.Ed.2d 532 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Scott v. United States
See Mitchell v. United States, 569 A.2d 177, 183 (D.C.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 986 , 111 S.Ct. 521 , 112 L.Ed.2d 532 (1990); Poteat v. United States, 559 A.2d 334, 336 (D.C.1989); Freeman v. United States, 495 A.2d 1183, 1187 (D.C.1985); Carter v. United States, 475 A.2d 1118, 1126 (D.C.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1226 , 105 S.Ct. 1222 , 84 L.Ed.2d 362 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. William L. Woods
See United States v. Pollack, 895 F.2d 686, 693 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 111 S.Ct. 520 , 112 L.Ed.2d 532 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Burgess v. United States
See Mitchell v. United States, 569 A.2d 177, 186 (D.C.App.) (present bodily condition), cert, denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 521 , 112 L.Ed.2d 532 (1990); Gezmu v. United States, 375 A.2d 520, 522 (D.C.App.1977) (state of mind); Nicholson v. United States, 368 A.2d 561, 564 (D.C.App.1977) (excited utterance). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William Hurd Wright
To obtain a conviction for robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a), the Government must show the defendant took property “by force and violence, or by intimidation.” “Intimidation means the threat of force.” United States v. Jones, 932 F.2d 624, 625 (7th Cir.1991); see United States v. Selfa, 918 F.2d 749, 751 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 521 , 112 L.Ed.2d 532 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Harris v. United States
(2×)
This is done based on “the gravity of the misconduct, its relationship to the issue of guilt, the effect of any corrective action by the trial judge, and the strength of the government’s case.” Gray, supra, 589 A.2d at 916 (quoting Dixon v. United States, 565 A.2d 72, 75 (D.C.1989)); accord, Mitchell v. United States, 569 A.2d 177 , 183 n. 5 (D.C.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 521 , 112 L.Ed.2d 532 (1990); Sherrod v. United States, 478 A.2d 644, 655 (D.C.1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Gray v. United States
See Mitchell v. United States, 569 A.2d 177, 180 , cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 521 , 112 L.Ed.2d 532 (D.C.1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Victor Miranda-Enriquez
“In determining whether there is reasonable suspicion to stop a car in the border area, officers may consider any number of factors, including: (1) characteristics of the area in which the vehicle is encountered; (2) the proximity of the area to the border; (3) the usual patterns of traffic on the particular road; (4) the previous experience of the agent with alien traffic; (5) information about recent illegal border crossings in the area; (6) the driver’s behavior, including any obvious attempts to evade officers; (7) aspects of the vehicle, such as a station wagon with concealed compartm…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Martin v. Crabtree
See 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a); see also United States v. Selfa, 918 F.2d 749 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 986 , 111 S.Ct. 521 , 112 L.Ed.2d 532 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nelson v. United States
(2×)
See Hunter v. United States, 606 A.2d 139, 144 (D.C.) (quoting Miller v. Avirom, 127 U.S.App.D.C. 367, 369-70 , 384 F.2d 319, 321-22 (1967)), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 509 , 121 L.Ed.2d 444 (1992); see also Mitchell v. United States, 569 A.2d 177, 180 (D.C.) (appellant is bound by position that his counsel took at trial), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 986 , 111 S.Ct. 521 , 112 L.Ed.2d 532 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jose P. Floresca
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Bledsoe, 898 F.2d 430 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 986 , 111 S.Ct. 521 , 112 L.Ed.2d 532 (1990); Moore v. United States, 512 F.2d 1255 (4th Cir.1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lyons v. United States
(2×)
See, e.g., Mitchell v. United States, 569 A.2d 177 , 183 n. 5 (D.C.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 986 , 111 S.Ct. 521 , 112 L.Ed.2d 532 (1990) (setting forth “substantial prejudice” standard for reviewing claims of prosecutorial misconduct when defendant objected at trial).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Benito P. Davila
See, e.g., United States v. Grimes, 899 F.2d 731, 732-33 (8th Cir.) (upholding denial of reduction even though defendant gave government information on other criminal activity), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 521 , 112 L.Ed.2d 532 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Willard Cortez Robinson
See also United States v. Selfa, 918 F.2d 749, 751 (9th Cir.) (observing that the elements of the crimes of which the defendant was previously convicted, and not the particular conduct of the defendant on the day the crimes were committed, should control the interpretation of § 4B1.1), cert, denied, — U.S. , 111 S.Ct. 521 , 112 L.Ed.2d 532 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mitchell v. United States
Reed v. United States, 452 A.2d 1173, 1180 (D.C.1987), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 839 , 104 S.Ct. 132 , 78 L.Ed.2d 127 (1983); see also Mitchell v. United States, 569 A.2d 177, 184-85 (D.C.) (prior statements admissible to rehabilitate witness), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 521 , 112 L.Ed.2d 532 (1990); Coltrane v. United States, 135 U.S.App.D.C. 295 , 303, 418 F.2d 1131, 1140 (1969) (same).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Grimes
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 90-5408.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 26, 1990.
Cited by 66 opinions | Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.