Hughes v. Leonardo, 498 U.S. 986 (1990). · Go Syfert
Search
Hughes v. Leonardo, 498 U.S. 986 (1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
51 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 21 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Marina Zarnes, Michael W. Nietupski, Jeffrey L. Hunter, Benny L. Battles, Michael R. Dionne, Marvin G. Bland, and Thomas J. Nietupski (ca7, 1995-02-01) · Strongest negative: Eddie Maes v. John Thomas, Warden and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico (ca10, 1995-01-23)
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Eddie Maes v. John Thomas, Warden and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
10th Cir. · 1995 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Meadows v. Legursky, 904 F.2d 903, 907 (4th Cir.) (en banc) (procedural default defense not raised before magistrate and district court is not waived where state court’s dismissal order was before magistrate), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 986 , 111 S.Ct. 523 , 112 L.Ed.2d 534 (1990).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Marina Zarnes, Michael W. Nietupski, Jeffrey L. Hunter, Benny L. Battles, Michael R. Dionne, Marvin G. Bland, and Thomas J. Nietupski
7th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Joshi 896 F.2d 1303 (11th Cir.) (the defendants waived their Sixth Amendment challenge to trial bifurcation by virtue of their counsel’s tactical decision to consent to such a procedure), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 986 , 111 S.Ct. 523 , 112 L.Ed.2d 534 (1990).
cited Cited "see" Hoke v. Thompson
E.D. Va. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Meadows v. Legursky, 904 F.2d 903 (4th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 986 , 111 S.Ct. 523 , 112 L.Ed.2d 534 (1990).
discussed Cited "see" Joe Louis Wise, Sr. v. David Williams Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia
4th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Meadows v. Legursky, 904 F.2d 903 (4th Cir.1990) (en banc) (“[C]onsistent or regular application of a state’s procedural default rules does not mean undeviating adherence to such rule admitting of no exception.” (citing Dugger v. Adams, 489 U.S. 401 , 109 S.Ct. 1211 , 103 L.Ed.2d 435 (1989))), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 986 , 111 S.Ct. 523 , 112 L.Ed.2d 534 (1990).
cited Cited "see" Frank R. Nickerson v. T.A. Lee Attorney General of North Carolina
4th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Meadows v. Legursky, 904 F.2d 903, 907 (4th Cir.) (en banc), cert, denied, — U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 523 , 112 L.Ed.2d 534 (1990). 3 .
discussed Cited "see" Pruett v. Thompson
E.D. Va. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
The exception 3 is when the petitioner has no available state remedy left, because it is clear the state would deny review on the basis of some procedural bar, as discussed infra. E.g., Harris v. Reed, 489 U.S. 255 , 109 S.Ct. 1038 , 1043 n. 9, 103 L.Ed.2d 308 (1989); see Meadows v. Legursky, 904 F.2d 903, 909 (4th Cir.1990) (en banc) (otherwise unexhausted claim deemed exhausted unless “reasonable possibility exists” that state court may apply an exception to its procedural default rules), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 523 , 112 L.Ed.2d 534 (1990).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Jose S. Chacon v. Tana Wood
9th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Joshi, 896 F.2d 1303, 1309 (11th Cir.) (acknowledging that the Court Interpreters Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1827 , was intended to protect the existing constitutional rights of non-English speaking criminal defendants), cer t. denied, 498 U.S. 986 , 111 S.Ct. 523 , 112 L.Ed.2d 534 (1990).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hughes
v.
Leonardo, Superintendent, Green Meadows Correctional Facility
No. 90-5631.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 26, 1990.
498 U.S. 986
Cited by 45 opinions  |  Published

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.