green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
6.5 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 39 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Bellon v. The PPG Employee Life and Other Benefits Plan
But see Heideman v. PFL Inc., 904 F.2d 1262, 1267 (8th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1026 (1991) (concluded without analysis that state statute of limitations for contracts covered the Section 510 claim); Clark v. Coats & Clark, Inc., 865 F.2d 1237, 1242 (11th Cir. 1989) (concluded that Section 510 claims are founded in contract and, therefore, most analogous state statute of limitations was that applicable to contract actions).” Id.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Sutter v. First Union National Bank of Virginia, Inc.
But see Heideman v. PFL, Inc., 904 F.2d 1262, 1267 (8th Cir.1990) (applying contract limitations period), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1026 , 111 S.Ct. 676 , 112 L.Ed.2d 668 (1991); Clark v. Coats & Clark, Inc., 865 F.2d 1237, 1241-42 (11th Cir.1989) (applying Georgia statute of limitations for enforcement of a statutorily created right and rejecting personal injury comparison because the cause of action is more akin to a breach of contract action).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Elmore v. Cone Mills Corp.
But see Alday v. Container Corp. of America, 906 F.2d 660, 666 (11th Cir.), (arguably holding that only equitable estoppel can be employed in ERISA context, and only when terms of plan are ambiguous), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1026 , 111 S.Ct. 675 , 112 L.Ed.2d 668 (1991).
discussed
Cited "but see"
William J. Elmore Wayne Comer, Individually and as Representatives of a Class of Similarly Situated v. Cone Mills Corporation Cone Mills Acquisition Corporation Dewey L. Trogdon Lacy G. Baynes, and Paul W. Stephanz Wachovia Bank and Trust Company, N.A., Robert B. Reich, Secretary of Labor, Amicus Curiae (Three Cases). William J. Elmore Wayne Comer, Individually and as Representatives of a Class of Similarly Situated v. Cone Mills Corporation Cone Mills Acquisition Corporation Dewey L. Trogdon Lacy G. Baynes, and Paul W. Stephanz Wachovia Bank and Trust Company, N.A., Robert B. Reich, Secretary of Labor, Amicus Curiae
But see Alday v. Container Corp. of America, 906 F.2d 660, 666 (11th Cir.), (arguably holding that only equitable estoppel can be employed in ERISA context, and only when terms of plan are ambiguous), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1026 , 111 S.Ct. 675 , 112 L.Ed.2d 668 (1991).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Youngbear v. Thalacker
prison regulations that infringe on the constitutional 913 rights of prisoners are judged by their reasonableness. prison officials are not required to choose the least restrictive means possible in furthering administrative interests.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Richard Owens, Aaron Durall Beavers, of the Estate of Richard Owens, Deceased v. Storehouse, Inc., and Klais and Company, Inc.
any retiree's right to lifetime benefits at a particular cost can only be found if it is established by contract under the terms of the erisa-gov-erned benefit plan document
discussed
Cited "see"
Campbell v. CHEVRON PHILLIPS CHEMICAL CO., LP
Nonetheless, “[p]lan descriptions in employee handbooks or otherwise distributed to employees are considered ERISA documents.” Hamilton v. Air Jamaica, Ltd., 750 F.Supp. 1259, 1265 (E.D.Pa.1990), rev’d on other grounds, 945 F.2d 74 (3d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 938 , 112 S.Ct. 1479 , *782 117 L.Ed.2d 622 (1992); accord Alday v. Container Corp. of Am,., 906 F.2d 660 , 665 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1026 , 111 S.Ct. 675 , 112 L.Ed.2d 668 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Island Creek Coal Co. v. Wells
See Alday v. Container Corporation of America, 906 F.2d 660 , 665 (11th Cir.1990) ("[A]ny ... right to lifetime medical benefits at a particular cost can only be found if it is established by contract under the terms of the ERISA-governed benefit plan document.”), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1026 , 111 S.Ct. 675 , 112 L.Ed.2d 668 (1991); Gable v. Sweetheart Cup Company, Inc., supra note 11 at 855 ("[I]n recognition of ERISA’s requirement that employee benefit plans be governed by written plan documents filed with the Secretary of Labor, a participant’s right to a fixed level of lifetime benef…
cited
Cited "see"
Adkins v. Holland
See Alday v. Container Corp. of America, 906 F.2d 660, 665 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1026, 111 S.Ct. 675 , 112 L.Ed.2d 668 (1991); Moore v. Metropolitan Life Ins.
discussed
Cited "see"
Dunn v. Uniroyal Chemical Co., Inc.
Deal v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co. of Texas, 5 F.3d 117, 118 (5th Cir.1993); see generally Fields v. Hallsville Independent School Dist., 906 F.2d 1017, 1019 (5th Cir.1990), cert denied, 498 U.S. 1026 , 111 S.Ct. 676 , 112 L.Ed.2d 668 (1991). 16 .
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Sears Retiree Group Life Insurance Litigation
See Alday v. Container Corp. of America, 906 F.2d 660, 665-66 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1026 , 111 S.Ct. 675 , 112 L.Ed.2d 668 (1991); Moore, 856 F.2d at 492; Etherington, 747 F.Supp. at 1276-77 . 10 *950 Plaintiffs also present as extrinsic evidence the affidavits of a number of the Company’s managers stating their belief that the life insurance benefits were “paid up” after ten years of participation in the Plan (PLExhs.R, MM-UU).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kienle v. Hunter Engineering Co.
See Heideman v. PFL, Inc., 904 F.2d 1262 (8th Cir.1990) (in ERISA action by beneficiary, Court looked to Missouri's borrowing statute to determine which state's statute of limitations applied), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1026 , 111 S.Ct. 676 , 112 L.Ed.2d 668 (1991); Barnett v. IBM, 885 F.Supp. 581 (S.D.N.Y. 1995) (in ERISA action by beneficiary, federal court looks to forum state's borrowing statute to determine which state's limitations period applies); cf. Held v. Manufacturers Hanover Leasing Corp., 912 F.2d 1197, 1202 (10th Cir.1990) (In ERISA action by beneficiary, federal court should apply…
cited
Cited "see"
Green v. Vermilion Corp.
See Brockington v. Certified Elec., Inc., 903 F.2d 1523, 1533 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1026 , 111 S.Ct. 676 , 112 L.Ed.2d 668 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Altosino v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.
(2×)
Id. at 1488 (citations omitted); accord Brockington v. Certified Elec., Inc., 903 F.2d 1523, 1530 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1026 , 111 S.Ct. 676 , 112 L.Ed.2d 668 (1991).5 Applying Steelmet to the present action, we must balance Alabama's interests in having its wrongful death statute apply against the federal maritime law principles of uniformity and harmony.
cited
Cited "see"
Wentworth v. Digital Equipment Corp.
See Alday v. Container Corp. of Am., 906 F.2d 660 , 666 & n. 15 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1026 , 111 S.Ct. 675 , 112 L.Ed.2d,668 (1991); Moore v. Metropolitan Life Ins.
discussed
Cited "see"
Santiago Rolon v. Chase Manhattan Bank
See Alday v. Container Corp. of America, 906 F.2d 660, 665-66 (11th Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, 498 U.S. 1026 , 111 S.Ct. 675 , 112 L.Ed.2d 668 (1991) (oral or written communications external to the summary plan description and in non-compliance with section 1022 are inapposite when summary plan description is clear); Hansen v. Continental Ins.
cited
Cited "see"
Wentworth v. Digital Equipment
See Aldav v. Container Corp. of Am., 906 F.2d 660 , 666 & n.15 (11th Cir. 1990), cert, denied, 498 U.S. 1026 (1991); Moore v. Metropolitan Life Ins.
discussed
Cited "see"
Local 56, United Food & Commercial Workers Union v. Campbell Soup Co.
See Alday v. Container Corporation of America, 906 F.2d 660, 664 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1026 , 111 S.Ct. 675 , 112 L.Ed.2d 668 (1991) (Having concluded “any retiree’s right to lifetime medical benefits at a particular cost can only be found if it established by contracts,” Circuit determined employer reserved right to alter or terminate plan).
cited
Cited "see"
Jensen v. Sipco, Inc.
See Alday v. Container Corp. of America, 906 F.2d 660, 665 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1026 , 111 S.Ct. 675 , 112 L.Ed.2d 668 (1991); Moore v. Metropolitan Life Ins.
cited
Cited "see"
Jensen v. SIPCO, Inc.
See Alday v. Container Corp. of America, 906 F.2d 660, 665 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1026 , 111 S.Ct. 675 , 112 L.Ed.2d 668 (1991); Moore v. Metropolitan Life Ins.
discussed
Cited "see"
Weatherly v. Illinois Bell Telephone
See Alday v. Container Corp. of Am., 906 F.2d 660 , 666 (11th Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, 498 U.S. 1026 , 111 S.Ct. 675 , 112 L.Ed.2d 668 (1991) (federal common law claim of estoppel only available where plan provision ambiguous and representations are made to employee involving oral interpretation of ambiguous provision); Greany v. Western Farm Bureau Life Ins.
cited
Cited "see"
Complete Health, Inc. v. Rasberry
See Alday v. Container Corp. of America, 906 F.2d 660, 666 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1026 , 111 S.Ct. 675 , 112 L.Ed.2d 668 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thompson v. Federal Express Corp.
See Alday v. Container Corp. of America, 906 F.2d 660, 666 (11th Cir.1990) cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1026 , 111 S.Ct. 675 , 112 L.Ed.2d 668 (1991); Heidgerd v. Olin Corp., 906 F.2d 903, 907 (2d Cir.1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bahshoota v. Nelnet, Inc.
As the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals has explained, As a general rule, equitable tolling is a remedy reserved for circumstances that are “truly beyond the control of the plaintiff.” Hill v. John Chezik Imports, 869 F.2d 1122, 1124 (8th Cir.1989); see also Lown v. Brimeyer, 956 F.2d 780, 782 (8th Cir.) (“Equitable tolling is appropriate only when the circumstances that cause a plaintiff to miss a filing deadline are out of his [or her] hands.”) (quoting Heideman v. PFL, Inc., 904 F.2d 1262, 1266 (8th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1026 , 111 S.Ct. 676 , 112 L.Ed.2d 668 (1991)), cer…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Lettrich v. JC Penney Co Inc
See also Alday v. Container Corp. of Am., 906 F.2d 660 , 663 (11th Cir.1990), cert, denied, 498 U.S. 1026 , 111 S.Ct. 675 , 112 L.Ed.2d 668 (1991); Musto v. American Gen.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Chilton v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America
See, e.g., Alday v. Container Corp., 906 F.2d 660 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1026 , 111 S.Ct. 675 , 112 L.Ed.2d 668 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
78 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 615, 74 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 45,630 Brenda Shempert v. Harwick Chemical Corporation and Tom Breckenridge, Individually Lynne Gibel, Movant-Appellant. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Amicus Curiae
As a general rule, equitable tolling is a remedy reserved for circumstances that are "truly beyond the control of the plaintiff." Hill v. John Chezik Imports, 869 F.2d 1122, 1124 (8th Cir.1989); see also Lown v. Brimeyer, 956 F.2d 780, 782 (8th Cir.) ("Equitable tolling is appropriate only when the circumstances that cause a plaintiff to miss a filing deadline are out of his [or her] hands.") (quoting Heideman v. PFL, Inc., 904 F.2d 1262, 1266 (8th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1026 , 111 S.Ct. 676 , 112 L.Ed.2d 668 (1991)), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 860 , 113 S.Ct. 176 , 121 L.Ed.2d 122 (199…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brenda Shempert v. Harwick Chemical
As a general *798 rule, equitable tolling is a remedy reserved for circumstances that are “truly beyond the control of the plaintiff.” Hill v. John Chezik Imports, 869 F.2d 1122, 1124 (8th Cir.1989); see also Lown v. Brimeyer, 956 F.2d 780, 782 (8th Cir.) (“Equitable tolling is appropriate only when the circumstances that cause a plaintiff to miss a filing deadline are out of his [or her] hands.”) (quoting Heideman v. PFL, Inc., 904 F.2d 1262, 1266 (8th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1026, 111 S.Ct. 676 , 112 L.Ed.2d 668 (1991)), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 860 , 113 S.Ct. 176 , 121 L.Ed…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Moorish Science Temple of America, Inc. Frank Applewhite Curtis Owen v. Dennis Benson, Warden Steve Hokonson, Chaplain
See In re Young, No. 93-2267, slip op. at 20-21 (8th Cir. May 6, 1996) (threshold inquiry of RFRA claim is whether governmental action substantially burdens religious practice; definition of substantial burden); Brown-El v. Harris, 26 F.3d 68, 69-70 (8th Cir.1994) (policy restricts free exercise if it coerces inmate into violating religious belief); see also Salaam v. Lockhart, 905 F.2d 1168, 1170 (8th Cir.1990) (noting importance of personal name), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1026 (1991); cf. Azeez v. Fairman, 795 F.2d 1296, 1297, 1300 (7th Cir.1986) (no evidence that use of "committed" name until…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Moorish Science v. Dennis Benson
See In re Young, No. 93-2267, slip op. at 20-21 (8th Cir. May 6, 1996) (threshold inquiry of RFRA claim is whether governmental action substantially burdens religious practice; definition of substantial burden); Brown-El v. Harris, 26 F.3d 68, 69-70 (8th Cir. 1994) (policy restricts free exercise if it coerces inmate into violating religious belief); see also Salaam v. Lockhart, 905 F.2d 1168, 1170 (8th Cir. 1990) (noting importance of personal name), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1026 (1991); cf. Azeez v. Fairman, 795 F.2d 1296, 1297, 1300 (7th Cir. 1986) (no evidence that use of "committed" name un…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fred Tonnies
See also Alday v. Container Corp. of America, 906 F.2d 660, 665 (11th Cir.1990) ("[A]ny retiree's right to lifetime medical benefits at a particular cost can only be found if it is established under the terms of the Erisa-governed benefit plan document"), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1026 , 111 S.Ct. 675 , 112 L.Ed.2d 668 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re: Unisys Corp
See also Alday v. Container Corp. of America, 906 F.2d 660, 665 (11th Cir.1990) (“[A]ny retiree’s right to lifetime medical benefits at a particular cost can only be found if it is established under the terms of the Erisa-governed benefit plan document”), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1026 , 111 S.Ct. 675 , 112 L.Ed.2d 668 (1991).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
David Hulsey, and Gary Davis v. Kmart, Inc., a Michigan Corporation
See also Heideman v. PFL, Inc., 904 F.2d 1262, 1266 (8th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1026 , 111 S.Ct. 676 , 112 L.Ed.2d 668 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lucien B. Calhoun Robin L. Calhoun, Individually and as Administrators of the Estate of Natalie K. Calhoun, Deceased v. Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A. Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd. Palmas Del Mar Company Palmas Del Mar, Inc. Palmas Yacht Club, Inc. Marina De Palmas Yacht Club, Inc. Maxxam Properties, Inc. Abc Corporation Xyz Partnership(s) Candelero Hotel Corporation Marina De Palmas Shipyard, Inc. Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A. And Yamaha Motor Company, Ltd., in No. 93-1736 Lucien B. Calhoun Robin L. Calhoun, Individually and as Administrators of the Estate of Natalie K. Calhoun, Deceased, in No. 93-1737 v. Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A. Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd. Palmas Del Mar Company Palmas Del Mar, Inc. Palmas Yacht Club, Inc. Marina De Palmas Yacht Club, Inc. Maxxam Properties, Inc. Abc Corporation Xyz Partnership(s) Candelero Hotel Corporation Marina De Palmas Shipyard, Inc
See, e.g., Brockington v. Certified Elec., Inc., 903 F.2d 1523, 1528-33 (11th Cir.1990) (per curiam) (applying exclusivity provisions of Georgia Worker's Compensation Act to exclude additional recovery under general federal maritime law to nonmaritime worker injured within territorial waters), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1026 , 111 S.Ct. 676 , 112 L.Ed.2d 668 (1991). 68 Prior to Moragne, it was well established that state wrongful death statutes could apply to maritime deaths occurring in territorial waters.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Calhoun v. Yamaha Motor Corp.
See, e.g., Brockington v. Certified Elec., Inc., 903 F.2d 1523, 1528-33 (11th Cir.1990) (per cu-riam) (applying exclusivity provisions of Georgia Worker’s Compensation Act to exclude additional recovery under general federal maritime law to nonmaritime worker injured within territorial waters), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1026 , 111 S.Ct. 676 , 112 L.Ed.2d 668 (1991).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Arnett v. Aspin
See also Fields v. Texas Central Education Agency, 754 F.Supp. 580 (E.D.Tex.1989), aff'd, 906 F.2d 1017 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1026 , 111 S.Ct. 676 , 112 L.Ed.2d 668 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dawud Halisi Malik v. Neal Brown
See, e.g., Salaam v. Lockhart, 905 F.2d 1168 , 1170 n. 4 (8th Cir.1990) (“It is common practice for a [Muslim] convert to change his name as the Koran provides, and the former Anglo name is thought to be a badge of a spiritually unenlightened state and a relic of slavery.”), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1026 , 111 S.Ct. 677 , 112 L.Ed.2d 669 (1991); Ali v. Dixon, 912 F.2d 86, 90 (4th Cir.1990) (“the first amendment protects an inmate’s right to legal recognition of an adopted religious name” (citation omitted)); Felix v. Rolan, 833 F.2d 517, 518 (5th Cir.1987) (“The adoption of Muslim na…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
George G. Wise v. El Paso Natural Gas Company
See, e.g., Alday v. Container Corp. of America, 906 F.2d 660, 665 (11th Cir.1990) ("[A]ny retiree's right to lifetime medical benefits at a particular cost can only be found if it is established by contract under the terms of the ERISA-governed benefit plan document.") (emphasis added), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1026 , 111 S.Ct. 675 , 112 L.Ed.2d 668 (1991); In re White Farm Equipment Co., 788 F.2d at 1193 ("[T]he parties may themselves set out by agreement or by private design, as set out in plan documents, whether retiree welfare benefits vest, or whether they may be terminated.") (emphasis add…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Carr v. First Nationwide Bank
See, e.g., Alday v. Container Corp. of America, 906 F.2d 660, 665-66 (11th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1026 , 111 S.Ct. 675 , 112 L.Ed.2d 668 (1991); Musto v. American General Corp., 861 F.2d *1490 at 907; Moore v. Metropolitan Life Ins.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Georgia Marble Co.
v.
Whitlock et ux.
v.
Whitlock et ux.
No. 90-683.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 7, 1991.
Published
Citer courts: Eleventh Circuit (1) · N.D. Iowa (1)
Sup. Ct. Ga. Certiorari denied.