Mathews v. United States, 498 U.S. 1029 (1991). · Go Syfert
Mathews v. United States, 498 U.S. 1029 (1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
87 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 17 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Ford (ca4, 1996-07-15)
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982 2004 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Ford
4th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
Courts “presume that a jury will follow an instruction to disregard inadmissible evidence presented to it, unless there is an ‘overwhelming probability” that the jury will be unable to follow the court’s instructions ... and a strong likelihood that the effect of the evidence would be ‘devastating’ to the defendant.” Greer v. Miller, 483 U.S. 756 , 766 n. 8, 107 S.Ct. 3102 , 3109 n. 8 , 97 L.Ed.2d 618 (1987) (citations omitted); see United States v. Jones, 907 F.2d 456, 460 (4th Cir.1990) (“The jury is generally presumed to be able to follow an instruction to disregard evidence…
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Melvin A. Ford, United States of America v. Cynthia Evette Brown, United States of America v. Carlos Edwin McGill United States of America v. Michael Dewayne Short, United States of America v. Eric S. Brown, United States of America v. Norman O'Neal Brown, United States of America v. Walter Trevaughn Smith, United States of America v. Jeffrey Andrew Reid, A/K/A U.S., United States of America v. Roderick Brown, United States of America v. Hassan Lafiek Smith, United States of America v. Robert Antonio Williams, A/K/A John Doe, A/K/A Gibby, United States of America v. Michael Steven Smith, A/K/A Black Mike, A/K/A Smitty
4th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
Courts "presume that a jury will follow an instruction to disregard inadmissible evidence presented to it, unless there is an 'overwhelming probability' that the jury will be unable to follow the court's instructions ... and a strong likelihood that the effect of the evidence would be 'devastating' to the defendant." Greer v. Miller, 483 U.S. 756 , 766 n. 8, 107 S.Ct. 3102 , 3109 n. 8 , 97 L.Ed.2d 618 (1987) (citations omitted); see United States v. Jones, 907 F.2d 456, 460 (4th Cir.1990) ("The jury is generally presumed to be able to follow an instruction to disregard evidence, absent some st…
cited Cited "see" United States v. Charles Matthew Yates
10th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Jones, 907 F.2d 456, 462 (4th Cir.1990), cert, denied, 498 U.S. 1029 , 111 S.Ct. 683 , 112 L.Ed.2d 675 (1991); 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (b).
cited Cited "see" United States Secret Service Use of the National Crime Information Center
OLC · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See 498 U.S. at 1029.
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Mounts
7th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See e.g., United States v. Martinez de Ortiz, 907 F.2d 629 (7th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1029 , 111 S.Ct. 684 , 112 L.Ed.2d 676 (1991).
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Mounts
7th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See e.g., United States v. Martinez de Ortiz, 907 F.2d 629 (7th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1029 , 111 S.Ct. 684 , 112 L.Ed.2d 676 (1991).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Jesus Vea-Gonzales
9th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Jones, 907 F.2d 456, 460-67 (4th Cir. 1990) (holding that Guidelines require court to inquire into the validity of prior convictions, under the 1987 Note 6, and remanding for an evidentiary hearing on defendant’s claim that prior conviction resulted from an involuntary guilty plea), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1029 , 111 S.Ct. 683 , 112 L.Ed.2d 675 (1991).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Scott David Lattany (2×)
3rd Cir. · 1993 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See Henderson v. United States, 476 U.S. 321, 326 , 106 S.Ct. 1871, 1874 , 90 L.Ed.2d 299 (1986) ("The plain terms of the statute appear to exclude all time between the filing of and the hearing on a motion whether that hearing was prompt or not."); see, e.g., United States v. Gonzales, 897 F.2d 1312, 1315-16 (5th Cir.1990) (absent showing that defendant attempted unsuccessfully to obtain hearings on pretrial motions or that hearings were deliberately refused with intent to evade Speedy Trial Act, delay of over 427 days resulting from pretrial motions was fully excludable from seventy-day peri…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mathews
v.
United States
No. 90-5309.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 7, 1991.
498 U.S. 1029
Published

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.