In re Rubins, 498 U.S. 1066 (1991). · Go Syfert
Search
In re Rubins, 498 U.S. 1066 (1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
41 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 22 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: James S. McInerney Clara I. McInerney Mario Perez v. Suchai Tang Connie Tang Malee Tang Gordon Tang Eddie Tang (ca9, 1993-08-18)
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." James S. McInerney Clara I. McInerney Mario Perez v. Suchai Tang Connie Tang Malee Tang Gordon Tang Eddie Tang
9th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see also · confidence low
As stated in Blinder, Robinson & Co. v. SEC, 748 F.2d 1415 (10th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1125 (1985): 20 A Rule 60(b) motion is an extraordinary procedure which may be granted in [sic] a showing of due cause. [citation omitted]. 21 Even assuming that Blinder, Robinson's attorney's failure to object to the allegedly improper evidence was due solely to the negligence of their counsel rather than to deliberate litigation strategy, this would not constitute a sufficient showing to warrant the extraordinary relief sought. 22 Id. at 1420; see also In re Braen, 900 F.2d 621 , 629 (3d Cir.19…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re Rubins
No. 90-6393.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 22, 1991.
498 U.S. 1066
Published

Petition for writ of prohibition denied.