green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.1 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“There is ordinarily a presumption that a jury will follow [a court’s] curative instructions.”
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 27 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Rivera-Flores v. Puerto Rico Telephone Co.
But see, DeVargas v. Mason & Hanger-Silas Mason Co., 911 F.2d 1377, 1384-1388 (10th Cir.1990) (because there is an absence of clear intent by Congress that the statute be applied retroactively, the Court holds that the Restoration Act is not retroactive), ce rt. denied, 498 U.S. 1074 , 111 S.Ct. 799 , 112 L.Ed.2d 860 (1991).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Mullins v. Crowell
we apply the ordinary meaning of the term and conclude that an entity receives financial assistance when it receives a subsidy.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Linda Holmes v. City of Massillon, Ohio
there is ordinarily a presumption that a jury will follow curative instructions.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Michael Boyd
See State v. Boyd, 797 S.W.2d 589 (Tenn. 1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1074 , 111 S. Ct. 800 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. TROQUILLE
See State v. Burrell, 561 So.2d 692, 708 (La. 1990), cert, denied. 498 U.S. 1074 , 111 S.Ct. 799 , 112 L.Ed.2d 861 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Tauzin
See State v. Burrell, 561 So.2d 692 (La.1990), cert. denied, Burrell v. Louisiana, 498 U.S. 1074 , 111 S.Ct. 799 , 112 L.Ed.2d 861 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. DeCologero
See United States v. Gomez-Pabon, 911 F.2d 847, 860 (1st Cir.1990) (conspiracy), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1074 , 111 S.Ct. 801 , 112 L.Ed.2d 862 (1991); United States v. Dean, 647 F.2d 779, 788 (8th Cir.1981) (RICO).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re UNITED STATES
See United States v. Gomez-Pabon, 911 F.2d 847, 860 (1st Cir.1990) (conspiracy), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1074 , 111 S.Ct. 801 , 112 L.Ed.2d 862 (1991); United States v. Dean, 647 F.2d 779, 788 (8th Cir.1981) (RICO).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Michael Tyrone Gordon
W hitwell v. State, 520 S.W .2d 338 (Tenn. 1975); see State v. Boyd, 797 S.W .2d 589 (Tenn. 1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1074 , 111 S.Ct. 800 , 112 L.Ed.2d 861 (1991); State v. Mellons, 557 S.W .2d 497 (Tenn. 1977); Carmon v. State, 512 S.W.2d 595 (Tenn. Crim.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Irizarry-Sanabria
See United States v. Gomez-Pabon, 911 F.2d 847, 860 (1st Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1074 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lattimore v. RKK Enterprises Inc
See DeVargas v. Mason & Hanger-Silas Mason Co., Inc., 844 F.2d 714 , 720 n. 5 (10th Cir.1988) (noting circuit split on whether private party federal actors may be liable under Bivens but not deciding the issue), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1074 (1991)
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Tart
See State v. Burrell, 561 So.2d 692 (La.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1074 , 111 S.Ct. 799 , 112 L.Ed.2d 861 (1991) (where defendant shot 65 year old man and his 56 year old invalid wife in their home during robbery); State v. Wingo, 457 So.2d 1159 (La.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1030 , 105 S.Ct. 2049 , 85 L.Ed.2d 322 (1985) and State v. Glass, 455 So.2d 659 (La.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1080 , 105 S.Ct. 2159 , 85 L.Ed.2d 514 (1985) (where defendants bound and gagged an older couple in their home, shot them, and stole their car).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Lewis
Whitwell v. State, 520 S.W.2d 338 (Tenn.1975); see State v. Boyd, 797 S.W.2d 589 (Tenn.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1074 , 111 S.Ct. 800 , 112 L.Ed.2d 861 (1991); State v. Mellons, 557 S.W.2d 497 (Tenn.1977); Carmon v. State, 512 S.W.2d 595 (Tenn.Crim.App.1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hamilton v. Illinois Central Railroad
See DeVargas v. Mason & Silas-Mason Co., Inc., 911 F.2d 1377, 1383 (10th Cir.1990) (rejecting argument that Rehabilitation Act applied to Defendant that received compensation under a contract to provide guard services to the government), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1074 , 111 S.Ct. 799 , 112 L.Ed.2d 860 (1991); Mass v. Martin Marietta Corp., 805 F.Supp. 1530, 1543 (D.Colo.1992) (dismissing Rehabilitation Act claim because payments made by government to Defendant were compensation for services performed under a contract to provide services for the government).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Boyce
Whitwell v. State, 520 S.W.2d 338 (Tenn.1975); see State v. Boyd, 797 S.W.2d 589 (Tenn.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1074 , 111 S.Ct. 800 , 112 L.Ed.2d 861 (1991); State v. Mellons, 557 S.W.2d 497 (Tenn.1977); Carmon v. State, 512 S.W.2d 595 (Tenn.Crim.App.1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Calle
See United States v. Gomez-Pabon, 911 F.2d 847, 861 (1st Cir. 1990) (although defendants received concurrent rather than consecutive sentences for their dual convictions, adverse consequences still could result from the fact that two separate convictions issued), ce rt. denied, 498 U.S. 1074 (1991); United States v. Morehead, 959 F.2d 1489, 1506 (10th Cir.) (a criminal conviction, in addition to imprisonment and a penalty assessment, presents potentially adverse consequences), aff'd sub nom.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Francisco Rodriguez Claudio, A/K/A Pito
See United States v. Gomez-Pabon, 911 F.2d 847 (1st Cir.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1074 , 111 S.Ct. 801 , 112 L.Ed.2d 862 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Frank J. Guinan v. Paul K. Delo, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional Center
See Guinan v. Armontrout, 909 F.2d 1224 (8th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1074 , 111 S.Ct. 800 , 112 L.Ed.2d 861 (1991); Guinan v. Delo, 5 F.3d 313, 316 (8th Cir.1993) (treating motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) seeking relief from denial of first habeas petition as second habeas petition).
cited
Cited "see"
Whitmore v. Lockhart
See Guinan v. Armontrout, 909 F.2d 1224, 1230 (8th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1074 , 111 S.Ct. 800 , 112 L.Ed.2d 861 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Cutshaw
Ho weve r, “[w]he re the e videnc e in a record clearly shows the defendant was guilty of the g reater offens e and is devoid of any evidence permitting an inference of guilt of the lesser offense, the trial court’s failure to charge on a lesser offense is not error.” State v. Stephenson, 878 S.W .2d 530 , 550 (T enn. 19 94); see also State v. Boyd , 797 S.W.2d 589 , 59 3 (Ten n. 1990 ), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1074 , 111 S.Ct. 800 , 112 L.Ed.2d 86 1 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Baker v. Simmons
Kansas 1998), aff'd, 153 F.3d 726 (10th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1110 , 119 S.Ct. 882 , 142 L.Ed.2d 781 (1999); see also, DeVargas v. Mason & Hanger-Silas Mason Co., Inc., 844 F.2d 714, 722 (10th Cir.1988), cert. denied 498 U.S. 1074 , 111 S.Ct. 799 , 112 L.Ed.2d 860 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bowers v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n
See, e.g., DeVargas v. Mason & Hanger-Silas Mason Co., Inc., 911 F.2d 1377 , 1382-83 (10th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1074 , 111 S.Ct. 799 , 112 L.Ed.2d 860 (1991); Muller v. Hotsy Corp., 917 F.Supp. 1389, 1417-18 (N.D.Iowa 1996); Hamilton v. Illinois Central R.R.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Cutshaw
However, “[w]here the evidence in a record clearly shows the defendant was guilty of the greater offense and is devoid of any evidence permitting an inference of guilt of the lesser offense, the trial court’s failure to charge on a lesser offense is not error.” State v. Stephenson, 878 S.W.2d 530, 550 (Tenn.1994); see also State v. Boyd, 797 S.W.2d 589, 593 (Tenn.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1074 , 111 S.Ct. 800 , 112 L.Ed.2d 861 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Morris
See, e.g., United States v. Gomez-Pabon, 911 F.2d 847, 861-62 (1st Cir.1990) (holding that a conspiracy to import cocaine and a conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute are distinct offenses because they differ “in what they specify as the proscribed object of the conspiracy”), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1074 , 111 S.Ct. 801 , 112 L.Ed.2d 862 (1991); United States v. Rodriguez, 858 F.2d 809, 817 (1st Cir.1988) (holding that conspiracy to distribute cocaine and aiding and abetting the possession of cocaine with intent to distribute are distinct offenses and may be charged separat…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Maddox v. University of Tennessee
III The Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, mandates, in 29 U.S.C. § 794 (a), that “[n]o otherwise qualified individual with a disability in the United States, ... shall, solely by reason of her or his disability, be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.... ” It is clear, and is not disputed in this ease, that the University of Tennessee constitutes such a program or activity in this case, regardless of whether any federal funds are used by the university’…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Duncan
State v. Lopez, 99 N.M. 612, 613 , 661 P.2d 890, 891 (Ct.App.1983); see also United States v. Vontsteen, 910 F.2d 187, 191-92 (5th Cir.1990) (declining to extend Pearce to situations where overall sentence is not increased), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1074 , 111 S.Ct. 801 , 112 L.Ed.2d 862 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Foley
Compare, DeVargas v. Mason & Hanger-Silas Mason Co., Inc., 911 F.2d 1377, 1388-93 (10th Cir.1990) (substantive rules of law presumed not to apply retroactively), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1074 , 111 S.Ct. 799 , 112 L.Ed.2d 860 (1991).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DeVargas
v.
Mason & Hanger-Silas Mason Co., Inc.
v.
Mason & Hanger-Silas Mason Co., Inc.
No. 90-720.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 22, 1991.
498 U.S. 1074
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice White and Justice Marshall would grant certiorari.