green
Positive treatment
3.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. J. David Smith, David Smith
See United States v. Esposito, 912 F.2d 60, 61 (3d Cir.1990), ce rt. dismissed, 498 U.S. 1075 , 111 S.Ct. 806 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1032 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Stephen Saccoccia
See United States v. Esposito, 912 F.2d 60, 65 (3rd Cir.1990), cert. dismissed, 498 U.S. 1075 , 111 S.Ct. 806 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1032 (1991); United States v. Grayson, 795 F.2d 278, 282 (3rd Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1054 , 107 S.Ct. 927 , 93 L.Ed.2d 978 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Payne v. Tennessee
See Payne v. Tennessee, 498 U. S. 1076 (1991) (Stevens, J., dissenting).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cox v. State
See United States v. Esposito , 912 F.2d 60 , 65 (3d Cir. 1990), cert. dismissed, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 806 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1032 (1991) (assuming that the substantive offense-conspiracy distinction survives Corbin ); United States v. Scarpa , 913 F.2d 993 , 1013-14 n. 8 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 57 , 112 L.Ed.2d 32 (1990) (same); United States v. Pungitore , 910 F.2d 1084 , 1110-11 (3d Cir. 1990) (same); Apostoledes v. State , 83 Md.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Richard P. Console, United States of America v. Morton Markoff, D.O., United States of America v. Edward C. Curcio
See also United States v. Esposito, 912 F.2d 60 (3d Cir.1990) (prosecution of predicate offenses subsequent to a RICO acquittal did not violate double jeopardy), cert. dismissed, 498 U.S. 1075 , 111 S.Ct. 806 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1032 (1991); United States v. Esposito, 968 F.2d 300, 302 (3d Cir.1992) ("[Bjecause the jury found Esposito not guilty of the overall RICO charge, the jury did not answer any special interrogatories as to whether he had committed the specific predicate acts charged against him”); Pungitore, 910 F.2d at 1107 n. 21 (RICO prosecution based in part on a predicate act previousl…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mundy v. Angelicchio
Determination of whether an exceptional cireumstance exists justifying the use of deposition testimony in lieu of live witnesses lies within the sound discretion of the trial court. 4 Cooper v. Indiana Gas & Water Co. (1977), 173 Ind.App. 47 , 362 N.E.2d 191 ; see also Archem, Inc. v. Simo (1990), Ind.App., 549 N.E.2d 1054, 1058 (T.R. 32(A)(3)(e)), trans. denied, cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1076 , 111 S.Ct. 944 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1032 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
The court therefore adopted the following procedure: 1) persons seeking revision must petition EPA to revise the standard in question, together with supporting materials or references to supporting materials; 2) EPA must respond to the petition and, if it denies it, set forth its reasons; and 3) if the petition is denied, petitioner may seek review. 13 Id.; see also NRDC, Inc. v. Administrator, USEPA, 902 F.2d 962 , 988 (D.C.Cir.1990) (Wald, C.J.) (ordering EPA to provide court within 60 days with “clear and cogent reasons” why it had not acted for 10 years past statutory deadline for revi…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Quinton v. Superior Court
See also United States v. Esposito, 912 F.2d 60, 64-65 (3d Cir.1990), cert. dismissed, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 806 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1032 (1991).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re Jacobs
No. 90-1091.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 4, 1991.
Published
Petition for writ of mandamus dismissed under this Court’s Rule 46.