green
Positive treatment
4.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Metromedia Fiber Network, Inc. v. Various State & Local Taxing Authorities (In Re Metromedia Fiber Network, Inc.)
See Polur v. Raffe, 912 F.2d 52, 56 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 937 , 111 S.Ct. 1389 , 113 L.Ed.2d 446 (1991) (holding dismissal of plaintiffs claim is appropriate where complaint contains only eonclusory allegations of a violation of a Constitutional right); Barr v. Abrams, 810 F.2d 358, 363 (2d Cir.1987) (same).
cited
Cited "see"
Kashelkar v. MacCartney
See Polur v. Raffe, 912 F.2d 52, 55 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 937 , 111 S.Ct. 1389 , 113 L.Ed.2d 446 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Federico v. Board of Education of the Public Schools
See Polur v. Raffe, 912 F.2d 52, 56 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 937 , 111 S.Ct. 1389 , 113 L.Ed.2d 446 (1991); Zemsky v. City of New York, 821 F.2d 148, 151 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1019 , 108 S.Ct. 1760 , 100 L.Ed.2d 221 (1988); Sommer v. Dixon, 709 F.2d 173, 175 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 857 , 104 S.Ct. 177 , 78 L.Ed.2d 158 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Federico v. BD. OF EDUC. OF PUBLIC SCHOOLS
See Polur v. Raffe, 912 F.2d 52, 56 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 937 , 111 S.Ct. 1389 , 113 L.Ed.2d 446 (1991); Zemsky v. City of New York, 821 F.2d 148, 151 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 486 U.S. 1019 , 108 S.Ct. 1760 , 100 L.Ed.2d 221 (1988); Sommer v. Dixon, 709 F.2d 173, 175 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 857 , 104 S.Ct. 177 , 78 L.Ed.2d 158 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Berman v. Turecki
See Polur v. Raffe, 912 F.2d 52, 56 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 937 , 111 S.Ct. 1389 , 113 L.Ed.2d 446 (1991); see also Lewal v. Doe, 1994 WL 263521 at *3 (S.D.N.Y.1994) (Leisure, J.) (“plaintiff makes only vague and conclusory allegations of conspiracy that will not survive a motion to dismiss”).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Premises Known as 318 South Third Street
See United States v. South Half of Lot 7 and Lot 8, Block 14, 910 F.2d 488 (8th Cir.1990) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1389 , 113 L.Ed.2d 445 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Premises Known As 318 South Third Street, Minneapolis, Minnesota
See United States v. South Half of Lot 7 and Lot 8, Block 14, 910 F.2d 488 (8th Cir.1990) (en banc), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 1389 , 113 L.Ed.2d 445 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Carlin v. Gold Hawk Joint Venture
See Polur v. Raffe, 912 F.2d 52, 57 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 1389 , 113 L.Ed.2d 446 (1991); In re Martin-Trigona, 737 F.2d 1254 , 1262 (2d Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Folio Impressions, Inc. v. Byer California MacY New York, Inc. Lida Manufacturing Co. And John Does--20
See Polur v. Raffe, 912 F.2d 52, 56 (2d Cir.1990) (appellate court is free to affirm district court decision on grounds for which there is a sufficient record for a conclusion of law even if not relied on by district court), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1389 , 113 L.Ed.2d 446 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brown v. Middaugh
In his argument, plaintiff has done everything but articulate what specific evidence demonstrates a conspiracy under § 1985(3). “[C]omplaints relying on the civil rights statutes are insufficient unless they contain some specific allegations of fact indicating a deprivation of rights, instead of a litany of general conclusions that shock but have no meaning.” Barr v. Abrams, 810 F.2d 358, 363 (2d Cir.1987); see also Polur v. Raffe, 912 F.2d 52, 56 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 937 , 111 S.Ct. 1389 , 113 L.Ed.2d 446 (1991) (complaints based on violation of constitutional right must…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brady v. Marks
See, e.g., Polur v. Raffe, 912 F.2d 52, 57 (2d Cir.1990) (enjoining plaintiff from filing without leave of court further suits in federal court arising out of dissolution and receivership of certain corporation), 499 U.S. 937 , 111 S.Ct. 1389 , 113 L.Ed.2d 446 (1991); Safir, 792 F.2d at 25 (modifying district court’s injunction to provide that plaintiff was prevented from commencing additional federal court actions relating in any way to defendants’ pricing practices or merchant marine subsidies during certain period without first obtaining leave of district court); In re Martin-Trigona, 7…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Srubar v. Rudd, Rosenberg, Mitofsky & Hollender
Report at 10 (citing Ostrer v. Aronwald, 567 F.2d 551, 553 (2d Cir.1977)); see also Polur v. Raffe, 912 F.2d 52, 56 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 937 , 111 S.Ct. 1389 , 113 L.Ed.2d 446 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fariello v. Rodriguez
Accordingly, the Court determines as a matter of law that Family Court Judges Abrams, Berler, and McNulty and Family Court Judicial Hearing Officers Rodriguez and Ekadis are entitled to absolute immunity and the complaint is dismissed against all of those defendants, in its entirety, with prejudice (See Stump, supra, 435 U.S. at p. 356 , 98 S.Ct. at pp. 1104-05; see also Polur v. Raffe, 912 F.2d 52, 55-56 [2d Cir.1990], cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1389 , 113 L.Ed.2d 446 ([1991] [discussing absolute judicial immunity]).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Leon v. Murphy
Conspiracy Claims. 49 The district court found that Leon did not allege any specific facts supporting his allegations of fraud or conspiracy, but rather "only [alleged] that such fraud or conspiracy existed 'on information and belief.' " Further, the court also found that Leon's "papers in opposition to defendants' motions for summary judgment [do not] supply any basis for those allegations." Accordingly, the court held that defendants-appellees were entitled to judgment on those counts as a matter of law. 50 "A complaint containing only conclusory, vague, or general allegations of conspiracy …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Leon v. Murphy
“A complaint containing only conclusory, vague, or general allegations of conspiracy to deprive a person of constitutional rights cannot withstand a motion to dismiss.” Sommer v. Dixon, 709 F.2d 173, 175 (2d Cir.) (per curiam) (citing Angola v. Civiletti, 666 F.2d 1, 4 (2d Cir.1981); Con temporary Mission, Inc. v. United States Postal Serv., 648 F.2d 97, 107 (2d Cir.1981)), ce rt. denied, 464 U.S. 857 , 104 S.Ct. 177 , 78 L.Ed.2d 158 (1983); see also Polur v. Raffe, 912 F.2d 52, 56 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1389 , 113 L.Ed.2d 446 (1991); Zemsky v. City of New York,…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
South Half of Lot 7 and Lot 8, Block 14, Kountze's 3rd Addition to the City of Omaha
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 90-1069.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 25, 1991.
Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.