Cianciola v. United States, 501 U.S. 1219 (1991). · Go Syfert
Cianciola v. United States, 501 U.S. 1219 (1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
51 citation events (9 in the last 25 years) across 16 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Damon Dunbar (ca6, 2004-02-09) · Strongest negative: Smith v. State (del, 1994-09-23)
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Smith v. State
Del. · 1994 · signal: but see · confidence high
See also United States v. Enriquez-Estrada, 9th Cir., 999 F.2d 1355, 1359 (1993) (redaction sufficient protection); United States v. Macko, 11th Cir., 994 F.2d 1526, 1536 (1993) (same); United States v. Chatman, 10th Cir., 994 F.2d 1510, 1513 , cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 230 , 126 L.Ed.2d 185 (1993) (same); United States v. Strickland, 7th Cir., 935 F.2d 822, 826 (1991), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 884 , 116 L.Ed.2d 787 (1992) (same); United States v. Benitez, 2d Cir., 920 F.2d 1080, 1087 (1990) (same); United States v. Espinoza-Seanez, 5th Cir., 862 F.2d 526, 534 (1988) (same);…
discussed Cited "but see" United States v. Eric Chrismon, Andrew Poe, and Baron Jackson
7th Cir. · 1992 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see United States v. Payne, 923 F.2d 595, 597 (8th Cir.) (co-defendant's statement that he was planning to help “someone" escape from prison violated Bruton as obvious reference to co-defendant), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2830 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1000 (1991); United States v. Bennett, 848 F.2d 1134, 1141-42 (11th Cir.1988) (repeated references to "they,” combined with explanation *1473 by government of who "they" are, found to violate Bruton). 5 .
cited Cited "see" United States v. Damon Dunbar
6th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Cianciola, 920 F.2d 1295, 1299-1300 (6th Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, 501 U.S. 1219 , 111 S.Ct. 2830 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1000 (1991). 5 .
discussed Cited "see" State v. Ortiz (2×)
Neb. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See People v. Dunn, 77 N.Y.2d 19 , 564 N.E.2d 1054 , 563 N.Y.S.2d 388 (1990), cert. denied 501 U.S. 1219 , 111 S.Ct. 2830 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1000 (1991).
cited Cited "see" United States v. John Council Robinson
4th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Cianciola, 920 F.2d 1295, 1299 (6th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, __ U.S. __ , 111 S.Ct. 2830 (1991).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Howse
D. Utah · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Cianciola, 920 F.2d 1295, 1300-01 (6th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2830 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1000 (1991); United States v. Hastings, 847 F.2d 920, 922 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 925 , 109 S.Ct. 308 , 102 L.Ed.2d 327 (1988); United States v. Anderson, 902 F.2d 1105, 1109 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 182 , 112 L.Ed.2d 146 (1990).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Rafael Leiva and Jorge Rodriquez
7th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Cianciola, 920 F.2d 1295, 1300 (6th Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2830 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1000 (1991) (affirming an “ends of justice” exclusion granted to allow defense counsel more time to prepare for trial); Blandina, 895 F.2d at 297 (affirming an exclusion granted based on two factors); Vega, 860 F.2d at 787 (affirming an exclusion granted based on two factors); United States v. Thomas, 774 F.2d 807 , *641 810 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1024 , 106 S.Ct. 1218 , 89 L.Ed.2d 329 (1986) (affirming an “ends of justice” exclusion granted becaus…
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Leonard A. Donahue, United States of America v. Wally D. Weaver
8th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Payne, 923 F.2d 595, 597 (8th Cir.) (reference to "someone” violative of Bruton where "everyone at the trial knew who the ‘someone’ was"), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 2830 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1000 (1991); United States v. Long, 900 F.2d 1270, 1280 (8th Cir.1990) (reference to “someone" violative of Bruton because the reference "led the jury straight to” the defendant); United States v. Garcia, 836 F.2d 385, 390-91 (8th Cir.1987) (under the circumstances, "someone” is an acceptable reference); see also United States v. Strickland, 935 F.2d 822, 825-26 (7th Cir.…
cited Cited "see" United States v. Audrey Miller
8th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Payne, 923 F.2d 595, 598 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 2830 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1000 (1991).
cited Cited "see" United States v. John Allen Johnson, United States of America v. Richard Miller, A/K/A Richard Woods, United States of America v. Roderick Brooks, United States of America v. Devon Arnez Wilson
8th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Payne, 923 F.2d 595, 597 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 2830 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1000 (1991).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Johnson
8th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Payne, 923 F.2d 595, 597 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2830 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1000 (1991).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Jerry A. Crawford (2×)
6th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see also · confidence low
But, in light of the fact that the court disposed of the only pretrial motion on December 20, Crawford argues the Speedy Trial Act was violated because 1) the court failed to inquire into the reasonableness of the delay, 2) the court failed to explain properly its reasoning for the delay, 3) the court failed to specify the length of the delay when the continuance was granted, and 4) there was no basis for the court to exclude the entire period from December 21, 1990 to March 18, 1991. 40 Under the Speedy Trial Act, a court may grant an "ends of justice" continuance if "the failure to grant suc…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Brown v. Commonwealth
Va. Ct. App. · 1992 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also People v. Dunn, 155 A.D.2d 75 , 553 N.Y.S.2d 257 (1990), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 2830 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1000 (1991) (holding that a narcotics dog's sniff of drugs in the hallway outside defendant's apartment did not constitute a search within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cianciola
v.
United States
No. 90-7294.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 17, 1991.
501 U.S. 1219
Published

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.