green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.8 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“ERISA preempts civil actions against employers for severance pay predicated on common-law contract principles”
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Schonholz v. Long Island Jewish Medical Center
erisa preempts civil actions against employers for severance pay predicated on common-law contract principles
discussed
Cited "see"
Winter v. Hartford Life and Accident Ins. Co.
See Reichelt v. Emhart Corp., 921 F.2d 425, 431 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1231 , 111 S.Ct. 2854 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1022 (1991); see also Pagan v. NYNEX Pension Plan, 52 F.3d 438, 442 (2d Cir.1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Kulesza v. New York University Medical Center
See Reichelt v. Emhart Corp., 921 F.2d 425, 430 (2d Cir.1990), cer t. denied, 501 U.S. 1231 , 111 S.Ct. 2854 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1022 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Motorcity Of Jacksonville, Ltd. v. Southeast Bank N.A.
See Hall v. FDIC, 920 F.2d 334, 340 (6th Cir.1990) (holding that D'Oench prevents borrowers from arguing that a condition in a loan agreement has been waived by the bank's nonverbal conduct at the loan closing), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1231 , 111 S.Ct. 2852 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1020 (1991); Beighley v. FDIC, 868 F.2d 776, 783 (5th Cir.1989) (explaining that any inference derived from a bank's effort to help the borrower sell collateral would not appear in the bank's records and thus would be barred by § 1823(e)); FDIC v. Hamilton, 939 F.2d 1225, 1229 (5th Cir.1991) ("The rationale which bars claims b…
discussed
Cited "see"
Motorcity of Jacksonville, Ltd. v. Southeast Bank N.A.
See Hall v. FDIC, 920 F.2d 334, 340 (6th Cir.1990) (holding that D'Oench prevents borrowers from arguing that a condition in a loan agreement has been waived by the bank’s nonverbal conduct at the loan closing), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1231 , 111 S.Ct. 2852 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1020 (1991); Beighley v. FDIC, 868 F.2d 776, 783 (5th Cir.1989) (explaining that any inference derived from a bank's effort to help the borrower sell collateral would not appear in the bank’s records and thus would be barred by § 1823(e)); FDIC v. Hamilton, 939 F.2d 1225, 1229 (5th Cir.1991) ("The rationale which bars clai…
discussed
Cited "see"
Brookside Associates v. Rifkin
See Hall v. FDIC, 920 F.2d 334, 339 (6th Cir.1990) (if the debtor, seeking to avoid the bar of D'Oench, Duhme, quickly pays off a loan before FDIC files suit so that FDIC will no longer have an interest in an asset, D'Oench, Duhme should still apply to bar suit), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1231 , 111 S.Ct. 2852 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1020 (1991). 31 Brookside's allegations describe just the sort of secret agreement in relation to a loan that Langley found violated the public policy behind the statute and the D'Oench, Duhme doctrine.
discussed
Cited "see"
Brookside Associates v. Rifkin
See Hall v. FDIC, 920 F.2d 334, 339 (6th Cir.1990) (if the debtor, seeking to avoid the bar of D’Oench, Duhme, quickly pays off a loan before FDIC files suit so that FDIC will no longer have an interest in an asset, D’Oench, Duhme should still apply to bar suit), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1231 , 111 S.Ct. 2852 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1020 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Walsh v. Northrop Grumman Corp.
See Donovan, 680 F.2d at 273 (“The [Grumman] trustees also failed to measure up to the standard required of them' to do a more thorough job in ... investigating whether anything could be done to protect the Grumman pension fund in the event of an acquisition of Grumman by LTV.”) Moreover, this Court notes that under the present facts there is a valid issue of whether the Grumman Board of Directors violated ERISA when modifying the Employee Severance Plan in 1992. “[U]nder ERISA, the employer has the right at any time to amend or terminate a severance pay plan.” Reichelt v. Emhart Corp.…
cited
Cited "see"
Barrows v. RTC
See Hall v. FDIC, 920 F.2d 334, 339 (6th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1231 (1991); Winterbrook Realty, Inc. v. FDIC, 820 F. Supp. 27, 30-31 (D.N.H. 1993).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Anzalone
See United States v. Church, 32 MJ [70] at 72 [(CMA), cert. denied, [ 501 U.S. 1231 ], 111 S.Ct. 2853 [ 115 L.Ed.2d 1021 ] (1991) ].
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
The Inn At Saratoga Associates v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
See OPS Shopping Ctr., Inc. v. FDIC, 992 F.2d 306, 309-10 (11th Cir.1993); see also Hall v. FDIC, 920 F.2d 334, 339 (6th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1231 , 111 S.Ct. 2852 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1020 (1991); North Ark.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Inn at Saratoga Associates v. Federal Deposit Insurance
See OPS Shopping Ctr., Inc. v. FDIC, 992 F.2d 306, 309-10 (11th Cir.1993); see also Hall v. FDIC, 920 F.2d 334, 339 (6th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1231 , 111 S.Ct. 2852 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1020 (1991); North Ark.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Williamson
See also United States v. Church, 32 M.J. 70, 73 (C.M.A.) (where accused’s completion of all acts he believed necessary to complete contract murder of his wife held sufficient to constitute attempted murder), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1231 , 111 S.Ct. 2853 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1021 (1991); United States v. Crocker, 35 C.M.R. 725 , 1964 WL 4970 (A.F.B.R.1964) (accused’s act of advancing toward his intended victim with an open knife displayed at a time when an affray was imminent went beyond mere preparation).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McCabe v. Trombley
See also Reichelt v. Emhart Corp., 921 F.2d 425, 431 (2d Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, 501 U.S. 1231 , 111 S.Ct. 2854 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1022 (1991); Nealy v. U.S. Healthcare HMO, 844 F.Supp. 966, 970 (S.D.N.Y.1994).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Algie v. RCA Global Communications, Inc.
See, e.g., Reichelt v. Emhart Corp., 921 F.2d 425, 430 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1231 , 111 S.Ct. 2854 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1022 (1991).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hwang Jung Joo
v.
Immigration and Naturalization Service
v.
Immigration and Naturalization Service
No. 90-1610.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 24, 1991.
Published
Citer courts: E.D. New York (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.