green
Positive treatment
8.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 29 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Shaver
See United States v. Bibo-Rodriguez, 922 F.2d 1398, 1402 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1234 , 111 S.Ct. 2861 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1028 (1991) (admitting subsequent act of transporting marijuana hidden in a car’s door panels as evidence of knowledge for charged crime of transporting cocaine in car roof).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Shaver
See United States v. Bibo-Rodriguez, 922 F.2d 1398, 1402 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1234 , 111 S.Ct. 2861 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1028 (1991) (admitting subsequent act of transporting marijuana hidden in a car’s door panels as evidence of knowledge for charged crime of transporting cocaine in car roof).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Young
See United States v. Maguire, 918 F.2d 254, 258 (1st Cir.1990), cert. denied, Kavanagh v. United States, 501 U.S. 1234 , 111 S.Ct. 2861 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1027 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles Antoin Novey
See United States v. Novey, 922 F.2d 624 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1284 , 111 S.Ct. 2861 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1028 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Imad Naim Saadeh, Barbara Sudzus, and Albert Sudzus
See United States v. Chaidez, 919 F.2d 1193, 1201 (7th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1234 , 111 S.Ct. 2861 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1028 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Baker v. Monroe Township
See United States v. Sharpe, 470 U.S. 675, 682-83 , 105 S.Ct. 1568, 1573-74 , 84 L.Ed.2d 605 (1985); see generally United States v. Chaidez, 919 F.2d 1193, 1197-98 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1234 , 111 S.Ct. 2861 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1028 (1991); United States v. Trullo, 809 F.2d 108, 111 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 916 , 107 S.Ct. 3191 , 96 L.Ed.2d 679 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Baker v. Monroe Township
See United States v. Sharpe, 470 U.S. 675, 682-83 , 105 S.Ct. 1568, 1573-74 , 84 L.Ed.2d 605 (1985); see generally United States v. Chaidez, 919 F.2d 1193, 1197-98 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1234 , 111 S.Ct. 2861 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1028 (1991); United States v. Trullo, 809 F.2d 108, 111 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 916 , 107 S.Ct. 3191 , 96 L.Ed.2d 679 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Guzman
(2×)
See United States v. Chaidez, 919 F.2d 1193, 1198 (7th Cir.1990) (“Stops too intrusive to be justified by suspicion under Terry [v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968) ], but short of custodial arrest, are reasonable when the degree of suspicion is adequate in light of the degree and duration of restraint.”), certs. denied, 501 U.S. 1234 , 111 S.Ct. 2861 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1028 , and 502 U.S. 872 , 112 S.Ct. 209 , 116 L.Ed.2d 167 (1991); accord United States v. Tilmon, 19 F.3d 1221, 1224 (7th Cir.1994); see Galloway, 116 N.M. at 10 , 859 P.2d at 478 (“In determining the r…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Antoine D. Washington, United States of America v. Glen Early, Jr., A/K/A William Kevin Marcus
See Brown-Forman Corp. v. Tennessee Alcoholic Beverage Comm’n, 883 F.2d 504 , 513 (6th Cir.1989); accord United States v. Novey, 922 F.2d 624, 629 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2861 , 115 *1139 L.Ed.2d 1028 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Linda Marie Conkins, United States of America v. Alfredo Amador Barragan, United States of America v. Alberto Valencia Barragan, United States of America v. Robert Leroy Sandvig, United States of America v. Jacqueline Louise Fogel, United States of America v. Richard Robert Farmer, United States of America v. Salvador Soto-Mendoza
See United States v. Bibo-Rodriguez, 922 F.2d 1398, 1402 (9th Cir.) (evidence of similar, subsequent "bad act" is admissible as evidence to establish knowledge on an earlier occasion), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 2861 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1028 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Shirley F. Crowell, United States of America v. Alan Julian, United States of America v. Lora G. Horner, United States of America v. Barbara Ellen Burrell, United States of America v. Annie Varner Reomer
See United States v. Bibo-Rodriguez, 922 F.2d 1398, 1400 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 2861 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1028 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Suveges v. United States
See United ___ ______ States v. Day, 969 F.2d 39, 48 (3d Cir. 1992) (explaining that ______ ___ "the government is not required to file a pretrial information to subject a defendant to sentencing as a career offender under 7 U.S.S.G. 4B1.1"); United States v. Koller, 956 F.2d 1408 , 1417 _____________ ______ (7th Cir. 1992); United States v. Whitaker, 938 F.2d 1551 , 1552 ______________ ________ (2d Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 112 S. Ct. 977 (1992); Young v. _____ ______ _____ United States, 936 F.2d 533, 536 (11th Cir. 1991); United States ______________ _____________ v. McDougherty, 920 F.2d 5…
discussed
Cited "see"
Suveges v. United States
See United States v. Day, 969 F.2d 39, 48 (3d Cir.1992) (explaining that “the government is not required to file a pretrial information to subject a defendant to sentencing as a career offender under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1”); United States v. Koller, 956 F.2d 1408, 1417 (7th Cir.1992); United States v. Whitaker, 938 F.2d 1551, 1552 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 977 , 117 L.Ed.2d 141 (1992); Young v. United States, 936 F.2d 533, 536 (11th Cir.1991); United States v. McDougherty, 920 F.2d 569, 574 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 911 , 111 S.Ct. 1119 , 113 L.Ed.2d 227 (…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gary A. Newman
See United States v. Bibo-Rodriguez, 922 F.2d 1398, 1400-01 (9th Cir.) (setting forth test for evaluating admissibility of prior bad acts evidence), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2861 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1028 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jerry Don Mainard
See United States v. Bibo-Rodriguez, 922 F.2d 1398, 1402 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 2861 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1028 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Edgardo Porfirio Espinosa, Aka: Edgardo Espinosa
See United States v. Bibo-Rodriguez, 922 F.2d 1398, 1402 (9th Cir.) (subsequent act need not be identical but similar to show knowledge and intent), cert. denied, 111 S.Ct. 2861 (1991); United States v. Ramirez-Jiminez, 967 F.2d 1321, 1326 (9th Cir.1992) (prior criminal conduct must be similar if offered to show modus operandi).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael A. Williams
See United States v. Novey, 922 F.2d 624 (10th Cir.), cert. denied,U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2861 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1028 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Linda Marie Conkins, United States of America v. Alfredo Amador Barragan, United States of America v. Alberto Valencia Barragan, United States of America v. Robert Leroy Sandvig, United States of America v. Jacqueline Louise Fogel, United States of America v. Richard Robert Farmer, United States of America v. Salvador Soto-Mendoza
See United States v. Bibo-Rodriquez, 922 F.2d 1398, 1402 (9th Cir.) (evidence of similar, subsequent "bad act" is admissible as evidence to establish knowledge on an earlier occasion), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 2861 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1028 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Conkins
See United States v. Bibo-Rodriguez, 922 F.2d 1398, 1402 (9th Cir.) (evidence of similar, subsequent “bad act” is admissible as evidence to establish knowledge on an earlier occasion), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 2861 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1028 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Savely
See U.S. v. Novey, 922 F.2d 624 , 629 n. 5 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2861 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1028 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.
See United States v. Bibo-Rodriguez, 922 F.2d 1398, 1401 (9th Cir.), cert. denied,-U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 2861 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1028 (1991). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Fernando Vizcarra-Martinez
(2×)
See United States v. Hernandez-Miranda, 601 F.2d 1104, 1109 (noting the relationship between the similarity and relevance inquiries); see also United States v. Bibo-Rodriguez, 922 F.2d 1398, 1402 (9th Cir.) ("Similarity, to the extent that it bears on the relevance of the subsequent act, is neces-saiy to indicate knowledge and intent.”), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1234 , 111 S.Ct. 2861 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1028 (1991). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Fernando Vizcarra-Martinez
(2×)
See United States v. Hernandez-Miranda, 601 F.2d 1104, 1109 (noting the relationship between the similarity and relevance inquiries); see also United States v. Bibo-Rodriguez, 922 F.2d 1398, 1402 (9th Cir.) ("Similarity, to the extent that it bears on the relevance of the subsequent act, is necessary to indicate knowledge and intent."), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1234 , 111 S.Ct. 2861 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1028 (1991) 5 In Blackstone we found: The evidence that [the defendant] had marijuana for his personal use was simply not relevant to his knowing possession of [a] gun....
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Velazquez Rotger
See, e.g., ___ ___ ____ United States v. Maguire, 918 F.2d 254, 264 (1st Cir. 1990) _____________ _______ ("it is only in extraordinary cases that identification evidence should be withheld from the jury"), cert. denied, _____ ______ 501 U.S. 1234 , 111 S.Ct. 2861 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1027 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rodriguez Pena
See, e.g., United States v. Maguire, 918 F.2d 254, 264 (1st Cir. 1990) ("it is only in extraordinary cases that identification evidence should be withheld from the jury"), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1234 , 111 S.Ct. 2861 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1027 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Medicare & Medicaid Guide P 42,940 United States of America v. Wendy Miller Desalvo
See United States v. McDonald, 576 F.2d 1350, 1356 (9th Cir.) (finding that developer’s subsequent statements on land deals implied knowledge of previously fraudulent conduct), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 830 , 99 S.Ct. 105 , 58 L.Ed.2d 124 (1978); see also United States v. Bibo-Rodriguez, 922 F.2d 1398, 1399 (9th Cir.) (holding that despite differences in method, evidence of subsequent drug smuggling could be admitted to show prior knowledge and intent), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1234 , 111 S.Ct. 2861 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1028 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. O'NEIL
See, e.g., State v. Bibo-Rodriguez, 922 F.2d 1398, 1400 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 2861 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1028 (1991) (allowing evidence of later drug smuggling), U.S. v. Garcia-Rosa, 876 F.2d 209 , 221 (1st Cir.1989) (refusing to hold all subsequent act evidence inadmissible under rule 404(b); U.S. v. Masse, 816 F.2d 805, 813 (1st Cir.1987) (holding subsequent act of possession gave rise to permissible inferences to prove opportunity and motive); State v. May, 137 Ariz. 183 , 669 P.2d 616, 621 (App.1983) (allowing subsequent act evidence without discussion); People v. Esqui…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re of the Search of 4330 North 35th Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
See e.g., United States v. Chaidez, 919 F.2d 1193, 1197 (7th Cir., 1990), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 2861 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1028 (1991) (discussion of reasonableness of seizure of a person as measured along a continuum).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America, Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Ronald Whitaker, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
See, e.g., United States v. Novey, 922 F.2d 624, 628 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2861 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1028 (1991); United States v. McDougherty, 920 F.2d 569, 574 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1119 , 113 L.Ed.2d 227 (1991); United States v. Sanchez, 917 F.2d 607, 616 (1st Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1625 , 113 L.Ed.2d 722 (1991); United States v. Marshall, 910 F.2d 1241, 1245 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 976 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1061 (1991); United States v. Wallace, 895 F.2d 487, 490 (8th Cir.1990). 1 The lone circu…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Chavira
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 90-7665.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 24, 1991.
Cited by 6 opinions | Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.