green
Positive treatment
5.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Smith v. United States
See Gayden v. United States, 584 A.2d 578, 579 (D.C.1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 843 , 112 S.Ct. 137 , 116 L.Ed.2d 104 (1991) (quoting Frendak v. United States, 408 A.2d 364, 370 (D.C.1979)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thomas v. United States
See Blakeney v. United States, 653 A.2d 365 , 369 n. 3 (D.C.1995) (quoting Gayden v. United States, 584 A.2d 578, 580 (D.C.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 843 , 112 S.Ct. 137 , 116 L.Ed.2d 104 (1991)); see also Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 318 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979). 9 .
cited
Cited "see"
Ramirez v. State
See Gunsby v. State, 574 So.2d 1085 (Fla.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 843 , 112 S.Ct. 136 , 116 L.Ed.2d 103 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re T.H.B.
Settles v. United States, 522 A.2d 348, 357 (D.C.1987); Creek v. United States, 324 A.2d 688, 689 (D.C.1974); see Gayden v. United States, 584 A.2d 578, 583 (D.C.1990) (traveling with principal to scene of crime, remaining there during its commission, and fleeing with principal are sufficient to prove aiding and abetting), cert. denied 502 U.S. 843 , 112 S.Ct. 137 , 116 L.Ed.2d 104 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re THB
Settles v. United States, 522 A.2d 348, 357 (D.C.1987); Creek v. United States, 324 A.2d 688, 689 (D.C.1974); see Gayden v. United States, 584 A.2d 578, 583 (D.C.1990) (traveling with principal to scene of crime, remaining there during its commission, and fleeing with principal are sufficient to prove aiding and abetting), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 843 , 112 S.Ct. 137 , 116 L.Ed.2d 104 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Minor v. State
Lopez v. State, 632 So.2d 188 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 641 So.2d 1345 (Fla.1994); see Gunsby v. State, 574 So.2d 1085, 1088 (Fla.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 843 , 112 S.Ct. 136 , 116 L.Ed.2d 103 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Howard v. United States
(2×)
See Gayden v. United States, 584 A.2d 578, 579-80 (D.C.1990) cert. denied, 502 U.S. 843 , 112 S.Ct. 137 , 116 L.Ed.2d 104 (1991); Thompson v. United States, 567 A.2d 907, 908 (D.C.1989); Patterson v. United States, 479 A.2d 335, 338 (D.C.1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Bayer v. United States
See Gayden v. United States, 584 A.2d 578, 579 (D.C.1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 843 , 112 S.Ct. 137 , 116 L.Ed.2d 104 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Avincola v. Stinson
There is nothing here which suggests to me that the core language of Miranda was omitted or not understood, that petitioner was misled or not informed of his rights, or that the ultimate objectives of Miranda were in any way compromised.”); see also, e.g., United States v. Villegas, 928 F.2d 512, 518-19 (2d Cir.) (manner in which Miranda warnings were given “pass[ed] muster” where co-defendant read Spanish translation of Miranda rights to defendant and defendant “nodded affirmatively” after reading Spanish version printed on a card), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 843 , 112 S.Ct. 137 , 116 L…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mosby
v.
Gamble
v.
Gamble
No. 90-8300.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1991.
Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.