green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.5 score
“thompson ii”
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Estate of Underwood v. National Credit Union Administration
(2×)
thompson ii
discussed
Cited "see"
Lewis v. District of Columbia Department of Motor Vehicles
See Raphael v. Okyiri, 740 A.2d 935, 945 (D.C.1999). “[A]n employee of the District of Columbia must bring to an administrative tribunal, not the Superior Court, any complaint ‘arising out of employer conduct in handling ... adverse actions.’ ” Lattisaw v. District of Columbia, 905 A.2d 790, 793 (D.C.2006) (quoting District of Columbia v. Thompson, 593 A.2d 621, 635 (D.C.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 942 , 112 S.Ct. 380 , 116 L.Ed.2d 331 (1991)).
cited
Cited "see"
Newsome v. District of Columbia
See generally District of Columbia v. Thompson, 593 A.2d 621 (D.C.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 942 , 112 S.Ct. 380 , 116 L.Ed.2d 331 (1991); White v. District of Columbia, 852 A.2d 922 (D.C.2004).
cited
Cited "see"
Sanders v. District of Columbia
See District of Columbia v. Thompson, 593 A.2d 621 (D.C.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 942 , 112 S.Ct. 380 , 116 L.Ed.2d 331 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Sanders v. District of Columbia
See District of Columbia v. Thompson, 593 A.2d 621 (D.C.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 942 , 112 S.Ct. 380 , 116 L.Ed.2d 331 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tomblin
See United States v. Snyder, 930 F.2d 1090, 1093 (5th Cir.) (discussing trial court’s definition that “extortion under color of official right means the wrongful taking by a public officer of money or property not due to the officer or the office”), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 942 , 112 S.Ct. 380 , 116 L.Ed.2d 331 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. Jana
See Fahnestock & Co. v. Wattman, 935 F.2d 512, 518 (2d Cir.1991) (stating that "in the absence of an agreement on the subject " [i.e. a punitive damage award by arbitrators] state law is not pre-empted), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 380 , 116 L.Ed.2d 331 (1991), and cert. denied, - U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 1241 , 117 L.Ed.2d 474 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wall Street Associates, L.P. v. Becker Paribas, Inc.
See, Fahnestock & Co. v. Waltman, 935 F.2d 512 , (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 380 , 116 L.Ed.2d 331 (1991); Barbier v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc., 948 F.2d 117 (2d Cir.1991); Collins & Aikman Floor Coverings v. Froehlich, 736 F.Supp. 480 (S.D.N.Y.1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles G. Stephens, Sr.
(2×)
See United States v. Snyder, 930 F.2d 1090, 1093 (5th Cir.), later proceeding, 946 F.2d 1125 (5th Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 380 , 116 L.Ed.2d 331 (1991); see also 18 U.S.C. § 1951 . “[E]xtortion under color of official right means the wrongful taking by a public officer of money, or property not due to the officer or the office.” Snyder, 930 F.2d at 1093 ; see also United States v. Wright, 797 F.2d 245, 250 (5th Cir.) (“A conviction under the Hobbs Act may be sustained by a finding that a public official has taken a fee, unlawfully, under color of his public office,…
discussed
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CHARLES G. STEPHENS, SR
(2×)
See United States v. Snyder, 930 F.2d 1090, 1093 (5th Cir.), later proceeding, 946 F.2d 1125 (5th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, U.S. , 112 S. Ct. 380 (1991); see also 18 U.S.C. § 1951 . "[E]xtortion under color of official right means the wrongful taking by a public officer of money or property not due to the officer or the office." Snyder, 930 F.2d at 1093 ; see also United States v. Wright, 797 F.2d 245, 250 (5th Cir.) ("A conviction under the Hobbs Act may be sustained by a finding that a public official has taken a fee, unlawfully, under color of his -10- public office, in return for performa…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Grillo v. District of Columbia
See, e.g., District of Columbia v. Thompson, 593 A.2d 621, 635 (D.C.) (on petition for rehearing) (Thompson II), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 942 , 112 S.Ct. 380 , 116 L.Ed.2d 331 (1991), modifying in part 570 A.2d 277 (D.C.1990) (Thompson I).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wallace v. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
“The communication being privileged, defendant will be presumed to have been actuated by pure motives in its publication.” Ashford v. Evening Star Newspaper Co., 41 App. D.C. 395, 405 (1914); see also Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Holland, 367 A.2d 1311, 1314 (D.C.1977) (quoting Ash-ford). 9 If malice is shown, however, then the privilege is lost. “[T]he basis, if any, for excusing dissemination of a defamatory report ... within an employment group ... is ... the existence of a qualified privilege — a privilege which can be lost if the publication occurs outside normal channels, is otherwis…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Charles Bridges v. Sharon Pratt Kelly
Although there is case law to support appellees’ contention that the OEA is empowered to order reinstatement with back pay and some associated benefits, Brief for Appellees at 11; see also District of Columbia v. Thompson, 593 A.2d 621 , 635 & n.25 (D.C.) (The court observed that an employee who files an appeal before the OEA is "able to seek reinstatement, and perhaps back pay.”), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 942 , 112 S.Ct. 380 , 116 L.Ed.2d 331 (1991), such relief is far narrower than the remedies appellant requests from the District Court. 11 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hoggard v. District of Columbia Public Employee Relations Board
See, e.g., District of Columbia v. Thompson, 593 A.2d 621, 626-27 (D.C.1991), modifying, 570 A.2d 277 (D.C.1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 942 , 112 S.Ct. 380 , 116 L.Ed.2d 331 (1991). 2 On appeal, PERB and the District of Columbia both raise the threshold question whether the Superior Court had jurisdiction to consider appellant’s claim as to DCPS because appellant’s petition for review appeared limited to challenging PERB’s separate order rejecting appellant’s claim as to AFSCME. 3 Although the petition for review is not crystalline, we conclude that it sufficiently apprised the Superi…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Drejza v. Vaccaro
(2×)
See, e.g., District of Columbia v. Thompson, 570 A.2d 277, 289-290 (D.C.1990), vacated on other grounds, 593 A.2d 621 (D.C.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 942 , 112 S.Ct. 380 , 116 L.Ed.2d 331 (1991); Sere v. Group Hospitalization, Inc., 443 A.2d 33, 37 (D.C.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 912 , 103 S.Ct. 221 , 74 L.Ed.2d 176 (1982); Waldon v. Covington, 415 A.2d 1070, 1076-1077 (D.C.1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Fahnestock & Co., Inc.
v.
Waltman
v.
Waltman
No. 91-508.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 4, 1991.
Published
Citer courts: District of Columbia Court of … (2)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.