green
Positive treatment
1.2 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Housing Authority Of The City Of Fort Collins v. United States
Compare Alpine Ridge Group v. Kemp, 955 F.2d 1382, 1387-88 (9th Cir.) ("HUD is unable to present any argument explaining section 801 [of the HUD Reform Act] as anything other than Congress' attempt to save resources and money by legislating a compromise to its disputes with the owners."), cert. granted, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 490 , 121 L.Ed.2d 429 (1992). 22 In sum, we hold that Congress validly exercised its powers under the Spending Clause in requiring the Housing Authorities to accept the conditions of the ACC furthering public housing objectives on receipt of funds for their projects.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Housing Authority of Fort Collins v. United States
Compare Alpine Ridge Group v. Kemp, 955 F.2d 1382, 1387-88 (9th Cir.) (“HUD is unable to present any argument explaining section 801 [of the HUD Reform Act] as anything other than Congress’ attempt to save resources and money by legislating a compromise, to its disputes with the owners.”), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 490 , 121 L.Ed.2d 429 (1992).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kemp, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development
v.
Alpine Ridge Group
v.
Alpine Ridge Group
No. 92-551.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 16, 1992.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted.