green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.2 score
“n erroneous admission of evidence is harmless if it is more probable than not that its admission did not affect the jury's verdict.”
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Kelvin Neal
n erroneous admission of evidence is harmless if it is more probable than not that its admission did not affect the jury's verdict.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cheatham
The District of Kansas considered a similar issue of date and location plead within a conspiracy charge: “An indictment charging a count of conspiracy is sufficiently precise as to the time frame if the operative period of the conspiracy is set out.” United States v. Edmonson, 962 F.2d at 1541; see United States v. Harrison-Philpot, 978 F.2d 1520, 1525 (9th Cir.1992) (indictment is sufficient when it places the illegal conduct “within an identifiable time frame”), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 929 , 113 S.Ct. 2392 , 124 L.Ed.2d 294 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Todd Michael Arney
See United States v. Harrison-Philpot, 978 F.2d 1520, 1527 (9th Cir.1992) (holding that defendant's own inconsistent testimony concerning her activities was sufficient to permit jury to convict her of conspiracy), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 2392 (1993). 8 The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. * The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lindia
See United States v. Harrison-Philpot, 978 F.2d 1520, 1524 (9th Cir.1992) (holding inapplicable tail-wagging-dog concerns where disputed drug-quantity pertained only to sentence for convicted conduct), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 929 , 113 S.Ct. 2392 , 124 L.Ed.2d 294 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Juan Ramon Matta-Lopez, AKA Matta-Ballesteros, AKA Juan Ramon, AKA El Negro, AKA Juan Ramon Matta
See United States v. Harrison-Philpot, 978 F.2d 1520, 1527 (9th Cir.1992) (admissions to government agents regarding possible drug sale showed defendant's participation in prior charged conspiracy), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 2392 (1993); United States v. Bibo-Rodriguez, 922 F.2d 1398, 1400-02 (9th Cir.) (admissions made nine weeks after the charged offense showed defendant's knowledge), cert. denied, 111 S.Ct. 2861 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dudden
See United States v. Harrison-Philpot, 978 F.2d 1520, 1522-23 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 2392 , 124 L.Ed.2d 294 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7234, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12,341 United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Lynn Dudden, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
See United States v. Harrison-Philpot, 978 F.2d 1520, 1522-23 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 2392 , 124 L.Ed.2d 294 (1993). 51 At the sentencing hearing, the only proof submitted by the government was two affidavits prepared for sentencing in a different case.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Antonio Martinez, United States of America v. Augustin Nava, United States of America v. Alan Clark, United States of America v. Jose Manuel Limon-Uriarte
See United States v. Harrison-Philpot, 978 F.2d 1520, 1525 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 2392 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
People of the Territory of Guam v. Juan Mafnas Atoigue
See United States v. Harrison-Philpot, 978 F.2d 1520, 1525 (9th Cir.1992) (regarding dates of conspiracy), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 2392 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Manuel Guerra Gamboa
See United States v. Harrison-Philpot, 978 F.2d 1520, 1522 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 2392 (1993) (government has burden of establishing quantity of drugs under Sec. 2D1.1 by preponderance of evidence).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Donald Alonzo McNeil
See United States v. Harrison-Philpot, 978 F.2d 1520, 1527 (9th Cir.1992) ("an erroneous admission of evidence is harmless if it is more probable than not that its admission did not affect the jury's verdict"), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 2392 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wayne Patrick Gebro
See United States v. Harrison-Philpot, 978 F.2d 1520, 1527 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 2392 (1993) (nonconstitutional error in "admission of evidence is harmless if it is more probable than not that its admission did not affect the jury's verdict"); see also Fed.R.Crim.P. 52(a).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jose Noel Garcia, United States of America v. Luis Alberto Garibaldi-Gomez, United States of America v. Geraldo Prieto-Martinez, United States of America v. Fernando Alcarez-Ochoa, United States of America v. Benito Rubio-Garcia, United States of America v. Israel Aguilar-Pacheco
See United States v. Harrison-Philpot, 978 F.2d 1520, 1525-26 (9th Cir.1992) (indictment which indicates that alleged illegal conduct occurred within an identifiable time frame identifies the relevant dates of the conspiracy with sufficiently specificity), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 2392 (1993); United States v. McCown, 711 F.2d 1441, 1450 (9th Cir.1983) (indictment stating that conspiracy began "on or about" and ended "on or about" certain dates is sufficient to apprise defendant of charges). 47 It is also possible to interpret Rubio-Garcia's, Prieto-Martinez's, and Aguilar-Pacheco's contention …
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Alfonso Mendoza, United States of America v. German Silva, United States of America v. Sergio Mendoza
See United States v. Harrison-Philpot, 978 F.2d 1520, 1526 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 2392 , 124 L.Ed.2d 294 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ramos
“An indictment charging a count of conspiracy, is sufficiently precise as to the .time frame if the operative period of the conspiracy is set out.” United States v. Edmonson, 962 F.2d at 1541 ; see United States v. Harrison-Philpot, 978 F.2d 1520, 1525 (9th Cir.1992) (indictment is sufficient when it places the illegal conduct “within an identifiable time frame’’), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 2392 , 124 L.Ed.2d 294 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jerry Don Mainard
See United States v. Harrison-Philpot, 978 F.2d 1520, 1527 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 2392 , 124 L.Ed.2d 294 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Miles G. Ramsey, United States of America v. Miles G. Ramsey
See, e.g., United States v. Harrison-Philpot, 978 F.2d 1520, 1526 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 2392 (1993); United States v. Laykin, 886 F.2d 1534, 1543 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 905 (1990).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pettitt
v.
Westport Savings Bank
v.
Westport Savings Bank
No. 92-8264.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 17, 1993.
Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.