“except in cases of fundamental error, an appellate court will not consider an issue unless it was presented to the lower court.”
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited "but see"
Coleman v. State
(4×)
But see Hughes v. State, 878 S.W.2d 142, 151 (Tex.Crim.App. 1992) (requirement that error be preserved is a "systemic” one), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1152 , 114 S.Ct. 2184 , 128 L.Ed.2d 902 (1994).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Thompson v. State
except in cases of fundamental error, an appellate court will not consider an issue unless it was presented to the lower court.
discussed
Cited "see"
Gabriel Edward Gomez v. State
(2×)
See Hughes v. State, 878 S.W.2d 142, 155 (Tex.Crim.App. 1992)(op. on reh’g), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1152 , 114 S.Ct. 2184 , 128 L.Ed.2d 902 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Miguel A. Tijerina v. State
(2×)
See Hughes v. State, 878 S.W.2d 142, 151 (Tex.Cr.App. 1992) (on reh'g), cert. denied , 511 U.S. 1152 , 114 S.Ct. 2184 , 128 L.Ed.2d 902 (1994); Jones v. State, 942 S.W.2d 1, 2 (Tex.Cr.App. 1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Timothy Shane Leochner v. State
(2×)
See Hughes v. State, 878 S.W.2d 142, 151 (Tex.Cr.App. 1992) (on reh’g), cert. denied , 511 U.S. 1152 , 114 S.Ct. 2184 , 128 L.Ed.2d 902 (1994); Jones v. State, 942 S.W.2d 1, 2 (Tex.Cr.App. 1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Timothy Shane Leochner v. State
(2×)
See Hughes v. State, 878 S.W.2d 142, 151 (Tex.Cr.App. 1992) (on reh’g), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1152 , 114 S.Ct. 2184 , 128 L.Ed.2d 902 (1994); Jones v. State, 942 S.W.2d 1, 2 (Tex.Cr.App. 1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Timothy Shane Leochner v. State
(2×)
See Hughes v. State, 878 S.W.2d 142, 151 (Tex.Cr.App. 1992) (on reh’g), cert. denied , 511 U.S. 1152 , 114 S.Ct. 2184 , 128 L.Ed.2d 902 (1994); Jones v. State, 942 S.W.2d 1, 2 (Tex.Cr.App. 1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Timothy Shane Leochner v. State
(2×)
See Hughes v. State, 878 S.W.2d 142, 151 (Tex.Cr.App. 1992) (on reh'g), cert. denied , 511 U.S. 1152 , 114 S.Ct. 2184 , 128 L.Ed.2d 902 (1994); Jones v. State, 942 S.W.2d 1, 2 (Tex.Cr.App. 1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Davis v. State
(2×)
See Hughes v. State, 878 S.W.2d 142, 156 (Tex.Crim.App.1992) (op. on reh’g), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1152 , 114 S.Ct. 2184 , 128 L.Ed.2d 902 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lambrix v. Singletary
(2×)
See Espinosa v. State, 626 So. 2d 165, 167 (1993) (ruling that Espinosa’s HAC instruction claim was procedurally barred because he had challenged the HAC factor rather than the instruction itself and, alternatively, that any error in the instruction was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt), cert. denied, 511 U. S. 1152 (1994), and affirmed Espinosa’s sentence.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
DeGay v. State
See also Hughes v. State, 878 S.W.2d 142, 154 (Tex.Crim.App.1993)(opinion on rehearing), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2184 , 128 L.Ed.2d 902 (1994); Amores v. State, 816 S.W.2d 407, 413 (Tex.Crim.App.1991).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hughes
v.
Texas
v.
Texas
No. 93-8109.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 6, 1994.
Lead Opinion
Ct. Grim. App. Tex. Motion of petitioner to strike the brief in opposition denied. Certiorari denied.
Dissent
Justice Blackmun,
dissenting.
Adhering to my view that the death penalty cannot be imposed fairly within the constraints of our Constitution, see my dissent in Callins v. Collins, 510 U. S. 1141, 1143 (1994), I would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentence in this case.