green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
9.4 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1996 ·
…plaintiff seeking to establish harassment under a hostile environment theory must demonstrate some specific basis to hold the employer liable for the misconduct of its employees.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 27 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Karen Williams v. Bruce Banning
But see Karibian v. Columbia University, 14 F.3d 773, 780 (2d Cir.) (employer absolutely liable if supervisor uses actual or apparent authority to further harassment), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2693 , 129 L.Ed.2d 824 (1994).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Joann S. Reed, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. A.W. Lawrence & Co., Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
(2×)
plaintiff seeking to establish harassment under a hostile environment theory must demonstrate some specific basis to hold the employer liable for the misconduct of its employees.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Codrington v. Virgin Islands Port Authority
because the quid pro quo harasser, by definition, wields the employer's authority to alter the terms and conditions of employment - either actually or apparently - the law imposes strict liability on the employer for quid pro quo harassment.
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Bruneau Ex Rel. Schofield v. South Kortright Central School District
(4×)
also: Cited "see"
Harris, 510 U.S. at 17, 114 S.Ct. at 368.
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Father Belle Community Center v. New York State Division of Human Rights
(3×)
A hostile work environment exists "[w]hen the workplace is permeated with 'discriminatory intimidation, ridicule, and insult,’ * * * that is 'sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the conditions of the victim’s employment’ ” (Harris v Forklift Sys., 510 US, supra, at 21; see, Rudow v New York City Commn. on Human Rights, supra, at 716-719).
cited
Cited "see"
Dougherty v. Ferrari Express, Inc.
See Karibian v. Columbia University, 14 F.3d 773, 777 (2d Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1213 , 114 S. Ct. 2693 , 129 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Fisher v. Electronic Data Systems
See id. (reaffirming its holding in Karibian v. Columbia Univ., 14 F.3d 773, 778 (2d Cir.), cert. denied 512 U.S. 1213 , 114 S.Ct. 2693 , 129 L.Ed.2d 824 (1994)).
cited
Cited "see"
Mack Oran Hill v. Gary L Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
See Hill v. Texas, 512 U.S. 1213 , 114 S.Ct. 2693 , 129 L.Ed.2d 824 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Coffey v. Dobbs International Services, Inc.
See Karibian v. Columbia Univ., 14 F.3d 773, 777 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 512 U.S. 1213 , 114 S.Ct. 2693 , 129 L.Ed.2d 824 (1994); see also Kotcher v. Rosa & Sullivan Appliance Center, Inc., 957 F.2d 59, 62 (2d Cir.1992) (“The supervisor is deemed to act on behalf of the employer when making decisions that affect the economic status of the employee.”).
cited
Cited "see"
Carmel A. Gallagher v. George J. Delaney, Robert A. Hansen, and Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
See Karibian v. Columbia Univ., 14 F.3d 773, 780-81 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 512 U.S. 1213 , 114 S.Ct. 2693 , 129 L.Ed.2d 824 (1994). 2.
discussed
Cited "see"
Cheryl A. DAVIS, Appellee, Thomas R. Davis, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SIOUX CITY, Appellant
(2×)
See Karibian v. Columbia University, 14 F.3d 773, 779-80 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1213 , 114 S.Ct. 2693 , 129 L.Ed.2d 824 (1994); Martin v. Cavalier Hotel Corp., 48 F.3d 1343, 1351-52 (4th Cir.1995); Canutillo Independent School Dist. v. Leija, 101 F.3d 393, 400 (5th Cir.1996), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 2434 , 138 L.Ed.2d 195 (1997); Kauffman v. Allied Signal, Inc., 970 F.2d 178, 183 (6th Cir,), cert. denied 506 U.S. 1041 , 113 S.Ct. 831 , 121 L.Ed.2d 701 (1992); Ellerth v. Burlington Industries, Inc., 102 F.3d 848, 860 (7th Cir.1996), vacated and reh’g en banc granted, 10…
discussed
Cited "see"
Brandau v. State of Kan.
See Karibian v. Columbia University, 14 F.3d 773, 777 (2d Cir.1994) cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1213 , 114 S.Ct. 2693 , 129 L.Ed.2d 824 (1994); Huitt, 1993 WL 245744 at *3. 5 Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on this claim is therefore overruled.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Grievance of Butler
See Karibian v. Columbia Univ., 14 F.3d 773, 780 (2d Cir.) (knowledge of "low-level supervisor" is not imputed to employer where supervisor does not rely on supervisory authority to carry out harassment), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1213 , 114 S.Ct. 2693 , 129 L.Ed.2d 824 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bayard v. Riccitelli
See Murray v. New York University College of Dentistry, 57 F.3d 243, 249 (2d Cir.1995) (citing Karibian v. Columbia Univ., 14 F.3d 773, 779 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 114 S.Ct. 2693 , 129 L.Ed.2d 824 (1994), Kotcher v. Rosa & Sullivan Appliance Ctr., 957 F.2d 59, 62 (2d Cir.1992)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams v. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey
“When the workplace is permeated with ‘discriminatory intimidation, ridicule, and insult’ that is ‘sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the conditions of the victim’s employment and create an abusive working environment,’ Title VII is violated.” Id. (quoting Meritor, 477 U.S. at 65, 67 , 106 S.Ct. at 2405 ); see Karibian v. Columbia Univ., 14 F.3d 773, 779 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2693 , 129 L.Ed.2d 824 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Morales v. Human Rights Division
See Karibian v. Columbia University, 14 F.3d 773, 779 (2d Cir.), cert. denied — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2693 , 129 L.Ed.2d 824 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Min Jin v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
See also Karibian v. Columbia Univ., 14 F.3d 773, 778 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1213 , 114 S.Ct. 2693 , 129 L.Ed.2d 824 (1994) (citing Showalter v. Allison Reed Group, Inc., 767 F.Supp. 1205, 1212 (D.R.I.1991) (“The obvious tangible job benefit the plaintiffs received for succumbing to the harassment was the retention of their employment.”)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Min Jin v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
See also Karibian v. Columbia Univ., 14 F.3d 773, 778 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1213 , 114 S.Ct. 2693 , 129 L.Ed.2d 824 (1994) (citing Showalter v. Allison Reed Group, Inc., 767 F.Supp. 1205, 1212 (D.R.I.1991) (“The obvious tangible job benefit the plaintiffs received for succumbing to the harassment was the retention of their employment.”)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lisa L. Fitzgerald v. William Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service
See, e.g., Torres v. Pisano, 116 F.3d 625, 630 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 997 , 118 S.Ct. 563 , 139 L.Ed.2d 404 (1997). “[T]o establish a prima facie case of quid pro quo harassment, a plaintiff must present evidence that she was subject to unwelcome sexual conduct, and that her reaction to that conduct was then used as the basis for decisions affecting the compensation, terms, conditions or privileges of her employment.” Karibian v. Columbia University, 14 F.3d 773, 777 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1213 , 114 S.Ct. 2693 , 129 L.Ed.2d 824 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Black v. State of New York
In 1983, the Legislature designated the New York Stale Division of Housing and Community Renewal "the sole administrative agency to administer the regulation of residential rents" under the rent control and rent stabilization statutes (Omnibus Housing Act, 1983 N .Y.Laws ch. 403, § 3), and in 1985 additionally granted DHCR authority to amend the Rent Stabilization Code (a body of regulations previously administered by a private association of property owners), 1985 N.Y.Laws ch. 888, § 2; see also Rent Stabilization Ass'n of New York City, Inc. v. Higgins, 83 N.Y.2d 156, 164-168 , 608 N.Y.S.2…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Manuel Marmolejo v. Birdair, Inc.
See, e.g., Karibian v. Columbia University, 14 F.3d 773, 779 (2d Cir.) (employer not liable for discriminatory harassment perpetrated by plaintiffs co-workers unless employer either provided no reasonable avenue for complaint or knew of the harassment but did nothing about it), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1213 , 114 S.Ct. 2693 , 129 L.Ed.2d 824 (1994); Kotcher v. Rosa and Sullivan Appliance Center, Inc., 957 F.2d 59, 63 (2d Cir.1992) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lamb v. Household Credit Services
The Second Circuit adheres to a general rule that for the knowledge of a supervisor to be imputed to the company, that supervisor must be “at a sufficiently high level in the hierarchy of the company.” See Kotcher v. Rosa & Sullivan Appliance Ctr., Inc., 957 F.2d 59, 64 (2d Cir.1992); see also Karibian v. Columbia Univ., 14 F.3d 773, 780 (2d Cir.1994), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1213 , 114 S.Ct. 2693 , 129 L.Ed.2d 824 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation v. New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal
See Yee v. City of Escondido, 503 U.S. 519, 529 , 112 S.Ct. 1522, 1529 , 118 L.Ed.2d 153 (1992); see also Rent Stabilization Ass’n v. Higgins, 83 N.Y.2d 156, 172-73 , 608 N.Y.S.2d 930 , 630 N.E.2d 626 (1993), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2693 , 129 L.Ed.2d 823 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
KAREN VAN ZANT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES; And Kenneth Hasan King, Defendants-Appellees
Kotcher, 957 F.2d at 64 ; see also Karibian v. Columbia Univ., 14 F.3d 773, 780 (2d Cir.), cert. denied , — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2693 , 129 L.Ed.2d 824 (1994) (knowledge of “low-level supervisor” not imputed to employer).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
American Telephone And Telegraph Company v. Winback And Conserve Program, Inc.
See also Karibian v. Columbia Univ., 14 F.3d 773, 780 (2d Cir.) ("an employer is liable for the discriminatorily abusive work environment created by a supervisor if the supervisor uses his actual or apparent authority to further the harassment, or if he was otherwise aided in accomplishing the harassment by the existence of the agency relationship"), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 2693 , 129 L.Ed.2d 824 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Winback & Conserve Program, Inc.
See also Karibian v. Columbia Univ., 14 F.3d 773, 780 (2d Cir.) (“an employer is liable for the discriminatorily abusive work environment created by a supervisor if the supervisor uses his actual or apparent authority to further the harassment, or if he was otherwise aided in accomplishing the harassment by the existence of the agency relationship”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2693 , 129 L.Ed.2d 824 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Henry v. Gehl Corp.
Hastings v. Hancock, 842 F.Supp. 1315, 1320 (D.Kan.1993); see, e.g., Karibian v. Columbia University, 14 F.3d 773, 780 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, -U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2693 , 129 L.Ed.2d 824 (1994), and Dutt v. Delaware State College, 854 F.Supp. 276, 280-81 (D.Del.1994); cf. Bouton v. BMW of North America, Inc., 29 F.3d 103, 108-10 (3rd Cir.1994). 4 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
King
v.
Boone, Warden
v.
Boone, Warden
No. 93-8855.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 13, 1994.
Published
Citer courts: Second Circuit (2) · Virgin Islands (1)
C. A. 10th Cir. Motion of petitioner to defer consideration of petition for writ of certiorari denied. Certiorari denied.