green
Positive treatment
2.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Webber v. Esper
See Martinez v. Potter, 347 F.3d 1208, 1210 (10th Cir. 2003) (“[E]ach discrete incident of [discriminatory or retaliatory] treatment constitutes its own ‘unlawful employment Under Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, summary judgment is appropriate “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Universal Money Centers v. A.T. & T., 22 F.3d 1527, 1529 (10th Cir.), cert.…
cited
Cited "see"
Priddy v. City of Kiowa
See Universal Money Centers, Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 22 F.3d 1527, 1529 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1052 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Zinn v. McKune
(2×)
See Universal Money Centers v. AT & T Co., 22 F.3d 1527, 1529 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1052 , 115 S.Ct. 655 , 130 L.Ed.2d 558 (1994). 8 Under Title VII, Ms. Zinn's employment status with the Department is "both a jurisdictional question and an aspect of [her] substantive claim" of retaliation.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Universal Money Centers, Inc.
v.
American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
v.
American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
No. 94-445.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 5, 1994.
513 U.S. 1052
Consideration, Took.
Published
C. A. 10th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.