green
Positive treatment
5.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Wiggins v. State
(2×)
See, for example, Hill v. Lockhart, 28 F.3d 832 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1102 , 115 S.Ct. 778 , 130 L.Ed.2d 673 (1995) (no investigation of significant psychiatric history, including positive reaction to anti-psychotic medication); Austin v. Bell, 126 F.3d 843 (6th Cir.1997), cert. denied, ____ U.S. ____, 118 S.Ct. 1526 , 140 L.Ed.2d 677 (1998) (no mitigation evidence presented; no investigation made of mitigating circumstances); Hendricks v. Calderon, 70 F.3d 1032 (9th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1111 , 116 S.Ct. 1335 , 134 L.Ed.2d 485 (1996) (no investigation into any mit…
discussed
Cited "see"
Pruett v. Norris
See Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586, 604 , 98 S.Ct. 2954, 2964-65 , 57 L.Ed.2d 973 (sentencer should “not be precluded from considering, os a mitigating factor, any aspect of a defendant’s character or rec-ord____”) “ ‘Given the severity of the potential sentence and the reality that the life of [the defendant’] was at stake, “we believe that it was [counsel’s] duty ... to collect as much information as possible about [the defendant] for use at the penalty phase of his state trial.” Hill v. Lockhart, 28 F.3d 832, 845 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1102 , 115 S.Ct. 778 ,…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ivory Mosby, Also Known as Rafiq Zareef Muhaymin
See Duncan Energy Co. v. Three Affiliated Tribes, 27 F.3d 1294 , 1297 (8th Cir.1994) (panel of this Court has no authority to overrule earlier decision), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 779 , 130 L.Ed.2d 673 (1995); United States v. Bartsh, 69 F.3d 864, 866 (8th Cir.1995) ("The law of the case doctrine prevents the relitigation of a settled issue in a case and requires courts to adhere to decisions made in *1280 earlier proceedings in order to ensure uniformity of decisions, protect the expectations of the parties, and promote judicial economy.”). 4 .
cited
Cited "see"
Morris Herring, Raymond Herring, James N. Corbett, Luis Valenzuela, Armando Alfaro, and Sherman Montgomery v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
See Eyak Native Village v. Exxon Corp., 25 F.3d 773, 777 (9th Cir.1994), ce rt. denied, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 778 , 130 L.Ed.2d 673 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9835, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 17,075 Morris Herring Raymond Herring James N. Corbett Luis Valenzuela Armando Alfaro, and Sherman Montgomery v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
See Eyak Native Village v. Exxon Corp., 25 F.3d 773, 777 (9th Cir.1994), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 778 , 130 L.Ed.2d 673 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Herring v. Federal Deposit Insurance
See Eyak Native Village v. Exxon Corp., 25 F.3d 773, 777 (9th Cir.1994), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 778 , 130 L.Ed.2d 673 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Benjamin Brewer v. Dan Reynolds
And, as the Supreme Court has observed, “[e]vidence of ... emotional disturbance is typically introduced by defendants in mitigation.” Eddings, 455 U.S. at 115 , 102 S.Ct. at 877 ; see Hill v. Lockhart, 28 F.3d 832, 844 (8th Cir.1994), ce rt. denied, — U.S.-, 115 S.Ct. 778 , 130 L.Ed.2d 673 (1995); Schlup v. Armontrout, 941 F.2d 631, 643 (8th Cir.1991), *1525 cert. denied, 508 U.S. 909 , 112 S.Ct. 1273 , 117 L.Ed.2d 499 (1992); see also Gary Goodpaster, The Trial for Life: Effective Assistance of Counsel in Death Penalty Cases, 58 N.Y.U.L.Rev. 299, 300-03 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Prescott v. Little Six, Inc.
City of Timber Lake v. Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, 10 F.3d 554, 559 (8th Cir.1993) (deferring to tribal court's decision that the tribal constitution gave the tribal court personal jurisdiction over non-Indians), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1236 , 114 S.Ct. 2741 , 129 L.Ed.2d 861 (1994); see also Duncan Energy v. Three Affiliated Tribes, 27 F.3d 1294 , 1300 (8th Cir.1994) ("The Tribal Court's determinations of federal law should be reviewed de novo while determinations of Tribal law should be accorded more deference."), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1103 , 115 S.Ct. 779 , 130 L.Ed.2d 673 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Prescott v. Little Six, Inc.
City of Timber Lake v. Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, 10 F.3d 554, 559 (8th Cir.1993) (deferring to tribal court’s decision that the tribal constitution gave the tribal court personal jurisdiction over non-Indians), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1236 , 114 S.Ct. 2741 , 129 L.Ed.2d 861 (1994); see also Duncan Energy v. Three Affiliated Tribes, 27 F.3d 1294 , 1300 (8th Cir.1994) (“The Tribal Court’s determinations of federal law should be reviewed de novo while determinations of Tribal law should be accorded more deference”), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1103 , 115 S.Ct. 779 , 130 L.Ed.2d 673 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Leonard Prescott v. Little Six, Inc.
City of Timber Lake v. Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, 10 F.3d 554, 559 (8th Cir.1998) (deferring to tribal court’s decision that the tribal constitution gave the tribal court personal jurisdiction over non-Indians), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1236 , 114 S.Ct. 2741 , 129 L.Ed.2d 861 *757 (1994); see also Duncan Energy v. Three Affiliated Tribes, 27 F.3d 1294 , 1300 (8th Cir.1994) (“The Tribal Court’s determinations of federal law should be reviewed de novo while determinations of Tribal law should be accorded more deference.”), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1103 , 115 S.Ct. 779 , 130 L.Ed.2d 673 (199…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Home Impressions, Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation
See also Gillette Co. v. Department of Treasury, 198 Mich.App. 303 , 497 N.W.2d 595 (1993), appeal denied, 445 Mich. 861 , 519 N.W.2d 156 , cert. den., 513 U.S. 1103 , 115 S.Ct. 779 , 130 L.Ed.2d 673 (1995) (holding that Pub.L. 86-272 was not applicable to its corporate tax because it was not measured by net income although “business income” was a starting point for calculation of the tax base.) In this case, the Director is using the activity of the Home Impressions in New Jersey as a reporting requirement under the Act and not as a means of calculating the amount of the minimum fiat tax …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Morales v. Coyle
See, e.g., Hill v. Lockhart, 28 F.3d 832 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1102 , 115 S.Ct. 778 , 130 L.Ed.2d 673 (U.S.1995): Kenley v. Armontrout, 937 F.2d 1298 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 964 , 112 S.Ct. 431 , 116 L.Ed.2d 450 (1991); Thomas v. Lockhart, 738 F.2d 304 (8th Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Yankton Sioux Tribe, a Federally Recognized Tribe of Indians, and Its Individual Members Darrell E. Drapeau, Individually, a Member of the Yankton Sioux Tribe v. Southern Missouri Waste Management District, a Non-Profit Corporation, Defendant-Third Party v. State of South Dakota, Third Party Charles Mix County, South Dakota Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe, Inc. United States of America Amicus Curiae. Vine Deloria, Jr. Philip S. Deloria Philip Lane, Sr. Philip Lane, Jr. James Weddell, Descendants of Francois Deloria, Signatory to the Treaty of 1858, and Descendants and Relatives of Philip J. Deloria, Chief of Band Eight of the Yankton Sioux Tribe, at the Time of the Negotiation and Ratification of the Agreement of December 31, 1892, Amici Curiae
Solem, 465 U.S. at 472-474 , 104 S.Ct. at 1167-68 ; see also Duncan Energy Co. v. Three Affiliated Tribes, 27 F.3d 1294 , 1297 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1103 , 115 S.Ct. 779 , 130 L.Ed.2d 673 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Yankton Sioux Tribe v. Southern Missouri Waste Management District
Solem, 465 U.S. at 472-474 , 104 S.Ct. at 1167-68 ; see also Duncan Energy Co. v. Three Affiliated Tribes, 27 F.3d 1294 , 1297 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 779 , 130 L.Ed.2d 673 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert T. Sidebottom v. Paul Delo Jay Nixon
See, e.g., Hill v. Lockhart, 28 F.3d 832 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 778 , 130 L.Ed.2d 673 (U.S. 1995); Kenley v. Armontrout, 937 F.2d 1298 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 964 , 112 S.Ct. 431 , 116 L.Ed.2d 450 (1991); Thomas v. Lockhart, 738 F.2d 304 (8th Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bowen v. Doyle
See, e.g., Duncan Energy Co. v. Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation, 27 F.3d 1294, 1300-01 (8th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, - U.S.-, 115 S.Ct. 779 , 130 L.Ed.2d 673 (1995); Texaco, Inc. v. Zah, 5 F.3d at 1376-77 ; Bank of Oklahoma v. Muscogee (Creek) Nation, 972 F.2d 1166 , 1170 (10th Cir.1992); Espil, 847 F.Supp. at 757 ; Kaul v. Wahquahboshkuk, 838 F.Supp. 515, 518 (D.Kan.1993). 37 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Eyak Native Village
v.
Exxon Corp. and Exxon Corp. v. Eyak Native Village
v.
Exxon Corp. and Exxon Corp. v. Eyak Native Village
No. 94-650; No. 94-855.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 9, 1995.
Consideration, Petitions, Took.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.