green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.4 score
“for a state to exercise jurisdiction consistent with due process, the defendant's suit-related conduct must create a substantial connection with the forum state.”
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Tv Azteca, S.A.B. De C v. Patricia Chapoy, and Publimax, S.A. De C v. v. Gloria De Los Angeles Trevino Ruiz, Individually and on Behalf of a Minor Child, A.G.J.T., and Armando Ismael Gomez Martinez
for a state to exercise jurisdiction consistent with due process, the defendant's suit-related conduct must create a substantial connection with the forum state.
discussed
Cited "see"
McGowan v. State
See United States v. Young, 470 U.S. [1] at 18, 105 S.Ct. [1038] at 1047[, 84 L.Ed.2d 1 (1985)]." Arthur v. State, 575 So.2d 1165, 1185 (Ala.Cr.App.1990), cert. denied, 575 So.2d 1191 (Ala.1991).' McNair v. State, 653 So.2d 320, 339-40 (Ala.Cr.App.1992), aff'd, 653 So.2d 353 (Ala.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1159 , 115 S.Ct. 1121 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1084 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Gamble v. State
See Ex parte McNair, 653 So.2d 353, 356 (Ala.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1159 , 115 S.Ct. 1121 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1084 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
McNair v. Haley
See McNair v. Alabama, 513 U.S. 1159 , 115 S.Ct. 1121 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1084 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Grayson v. State
See Ex parte McNair, 653 So.2d 353, 360 (Ala.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1159 , 115 S.Ct. 1121 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1084 (1995)." Loggins v. State, 771 So.2d at 1089 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Jackson v. State
See Watkins, supra, in which we had the opportunity in a death penalty case to remand for an evidentiary hearing on a Batson issue, but refused to do so." Ex parte McNair, 653 So.2d 353, 360 (Ala. 1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1159 , 115 S.Ct. 1121 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1084 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Loggins v. State
See Ex parte McNair , 653 So.2d 353 , 360 (Ala. 1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1159 , 115 S.Ct. 1121 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1084 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Douglas v. State
See Ex parte McNair, 653 So.2d 353 (Ala.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1159 , 115 S.Ct. 1121 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1084 (1995); Smith v. State, 590 So.2d 388 (Ma.Cr.App.1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Melson v. State
See United States v. Young , 470 U.S. [1] at 18, 105 S.Ct. [1038] at 1047 [, 84 L.Ed.2d 1 (1985) ].' Arthur v. State, 575 So.2d 1165, 1185 (Ala.Cr.App.1990), cert. denied, 575 So.2d 1191 (Ala.1991)." McNair v. State, 653 So.2d 320, 339-40 (Ala.Cr.App.1992), aff'd, 653 So.2d 353 (Ala.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1159 , 115 S.Ct. 1121 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1084 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Frazier v. State
See McNair v. State, 653 So.2d 320 , 333-36 (Ala.Cr.App. 1992), aff'd, 653 So.2d 353 (Ala. 1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1159 , 115 S.Ct. 1121 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1084 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ex Parte Myers
Under the plain error rule, this Court will "notice any plain error or defect in the proceeding under review, whether or not brought to the attention of the trial court, and take appropriate appellate action by reason thereof, whenever such error has or probably has adversely affected the substantial rights of the petitioner." Rule 39(k), Ala.R.App.P.; see Ex parte McNair , 653 So.2d 353 (Ala. 1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1159 , 115 S.Ct. 1121 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1084 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bryant v. State
See also Davis v. State, 494 So.2d 851 (Ala.Cr.App.1986). “ ‘As we explained in United States v. Young, 470 U.S. 1 [ 105 S.Ct. 1038 , 84 L.Ed.2d 1 ] (1985), the idea of “invited response” is used not to excuse improper comments, but to determine their effect on the trial as a whole.” McNair v. State, 653 So.2d 320, 339 (Ala.Cr.App.1992), aff'd, 653 So.2d 353 (Ala.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1159 , 115 S.Ct. 1121 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1084 (1995), quoting Darden v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. at 182 , 106 S.Ct. at 2472 . “ ‘[I]t “is not enough that the prosecutors’ remarks were undesirable…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bryant v. State
See also Davis v. State , 494 So.2d 851 (Ala.Cr.App. 1986). "`As we explained in United States v. Young , 470 U.S. 1 [ 105 S.Ct. 1038 , 84 L.Ed.2d 1 ] (1985), the idea of "invited response" is used not to excuse improper comments, but to determine their effect on the trial as a whole." McNair v. State , 653 So.2d 320 , 339 (Ala.Cr.App. 1992), aff'd, 653 So.2d 353 (Ala. 1994), cert. denied, *Page 719 513 U.S. 1159 , 115 S.Ct. 1121 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1084 (1995), quoting Darden v. Wainwright, All U.S. at 182, 106 S.Ct. at 2472 . "`[I]t "is not enough that the prosecutors' remarks were undesirable or …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Norris v. State
Compare Ex parte McNair, 653 So.2d 353, 360 (Ala. 1994) (noting that the evidence suggested that the elderly victim "remained conscious for several minutes following the attack, alone on the floor of her kitchen to die"), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1159 , 115 S.Ct. 1121 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1084 (1995); Ex parte Jefferson, 473 So.2d 1110, 1113 (Ala.1985) (in finding that the murder caused by multiple cuts to the victim's throat was especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel, the court noted, "Of special significance is the fact that the victim did not lose consciousness until several minutes after the attac…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Jackson v. State
See also Ex parte McNair, 653 So.2d 353 (Ala.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1121 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1084 (1995).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mains
v.
Lira
v.
Lira
No. 94-7078.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 21, 1995.
Published
Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.