Adams v. Groose, 514 U.S. 1084 (1995). · Go Syfert
Search
Adams v. Groose, 514 U.S. 1084 (1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
26 citation events across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Adolfo Gil Hernandez v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division (ca5, 2000-05-30)
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Adolfo Gil Hernandez v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
5th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hernandez v. Texas, 514 U.S. 1085 , 115 S.Ct. 1798 , 131 L.Ed.2d 725 (1995).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Harvard
5th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Pettigrew, 77 F.3d 1500, 1510 (5th Cir.1996) (citing United States v. Storm, 36 F.3d 1289, 1294 (5th Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1798 , 131 L.Ed.2d 725 (1995)).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Geraldo Rodriguez, A/K/A Jose Rodriguez
1st Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Storm, 36 F.3d 1289, 1292 (5th Cir.1994), cert. de.nied, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 1798 , 131 L.Ed.2d 725 (1995); United States v. Henderson, 746 F.2d 619, 622 (9th Cir.1984), aff'd, 476 U.S. 321 , 106 S.Ct. 1871 , 90 L.Ed.2d 299 (1986).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Michael Eugene Stutson
10th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See U.S. v. Earls, 42 F.3d 1321, 1326 (10th Cir.1994) (estimates passed standard where the witness was found credible and the testimony was corroborated), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 63 U.S.L.W. 3771 (1995); U.S. v. Deninno, 29 F.3d 572 (10th Cir.1994) (testimony from "questionable" people used in meeting standard), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 1117 (1995); Roederer, 11 F.3d at 981 (standard met where district court's determination was based on the testimony of a former supplier, an agent's evidence, and the probation officer's estimates).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Rebecca K. Crossley (99-4076) Starla Grubich (99-4080),defendants-Appellants
6th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see also · confidence low
The court reasoned that the Speedy Trial Act was enacted to guarantee a defendant a minimum of thirty days to prepare a defense and that in order “[t]o fulfill this policy, the 30-day period should commence only after the indictment or information has been filed and made public and a defendant has first appeared with counsel engaged or appointed to represent him at trial.” Id.; see also United States v. Storm, 36 F.3d 1289, 1293 (5th Cir.1994) (adopting the Daly court’s reasoning and commencing the thirty-day period on the date on which the district court appointed new counsel after dete…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Adams
v.
Groose, Superintendent, Jefferson City Correctional Center
No. 94-7547.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 24, 1995.
514 U.S. 1084
Cited by 20 opinions  |  Published

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.