green
Positive treatment
5.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States Ex Rel. Alderson v. Quorum Health Group, Inc.
See United States v. Northrop Corp., 59 F.3d 953, 963 (9th Cir.1995), ce rt. denied, 518 U.S. 1018 , 116 S.Ct. 2550 , 135 L.Ed.2d 1069 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
42 cont.cas.fed. (Cch) P 77,182, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7975, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12,861 in Re: H. Edwin and Mary Jo Schimmels, Debtors. United States of America v. H. Edwin Schimmels Mary Jo Schimmels
(2×)
See United States v. Northrop Corp., 59 F.3d 953, 968 (9th Cir.1995), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 116 S.Ct. 2550 , 135 L.Ed.2d 1069 (1996) ("[T]he private right of recovery created by the qui tam provisions of the [False Claims Act] exists not to compensate the qui tam relator, but the United States.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Schimmels (In re Schimmels)
(2×)
See United States v. Northrop Corp., 59 F.3d 953, 968 (9th Cir.1995), cert. denied,-U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 2550 , 135 L.Ed.2d 1069 (1996) (“[T]he private right of recovery created by the qui tam provisions of the [False Claims Act] exists not to compensate the qui tam relator, but the United States.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. County of Delaware
See United States ex rel., Green v. Northrop Corp., 59 F.3d 953, 963-64 (9th Cir.1995), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 116 S.Ct. 2550 , 135 L.Ed.2d 1069 (1996); United States ex rel.
cited
Cited "see"
United States Ex Rel. Dunleavy v. County of Delaware
See United States ex rel., Green v. Northrop Corp., 59 F.3d 953, 963-64 (9th Cir.1995), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 116 S.Ct. 2550 , 135 L.Ed.2d 1069 (1996); United States ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see"
Upper Chattahoochee Riverkeeper Fund, Inc. v. City of Atlanta
See Northwest Environmental Advocates v. Portland, 56 F.3d 979, 985-90 (9th Cir.1995), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 2550 , 135 L.Ed.2d 1069 (1996) (holding citizen suit jurisdiction exists to enforce permit conditions based on state-established standards); Culbertson v. Coats American, Inc., 913 F.Supp. 1572, 1581-82 (N.D.Ga.1995) (holding that “the CWA authorizes citizen, suits for the enforcement of all conditions of NPDES permits” including those imposed by Georgia law); see also Environmental Protection Agency v. California, 426 U.S. 200, 223-24 , 96 S.Ct. 2022, 2033-34 , 48 L.Ed.…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Ex Rel. DeCarlo v. Kiewit/AFC Enterprises, Inc.
See United States v. Northrop Corp., 59 F.3d 958 (9th Cir.1995), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 2550 , 135 L.Ed.2d 1069 (1996). 4 In Northrop, the plaintiff claimed that Northrop wrongfully discharged him upon learning that he had uncovered evidence that Northrop was over-billing the United States on a military contract.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ohio
v.
Beeman et ux.
v.
Beeman et ux.
No. 95-1731.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 24, 1996.
Published
Sup. Ct. Ohio. Cer-tiorari denied.