green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
8.0 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 2003 ·
…district judges are accorded wide discretion in ruling upon discovery motions, and appellate review is accordingly deferential.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Dickerson v. Mitchell
there is no federal constitutional requirement that a state appellate court conduct a comparative proportionality review.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Iraola & Cia, S.A. v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation
district judges are accorded wide discretion in ruling upon discovery motions, and appellate review is accordingly deferential.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
IRAOLA & CIA, S.A. v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.
district judges are accorded wide discretion in ruling upon discovery motions, and appellate review is accordingly deferential.
cited
Cited "see"
Koras v. Robinson
See McQueen v. Scroggy, 99 F.3d 1302, 1311 (6th Cir.1996), cert. denied 520 U.S. 1257 , 117 S.Ct. 2422 , 138 L.Ed.2d 185 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Slaughter v. Parker
See McQueen v. Scroggy, 99 F.3d 1302, 1332 (6th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1257 , 117 S.Ct. 2422 , 138 L.Ed.2d 185 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Hbrandon Lee Flagner v. Reginald Wilkinson
See Collyer v. Darling, 98 F.3d 211 , 228 n.18 (6th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1257 (1997); Cagle v. Gilley, 957 F.2d 1347, 1350 (6th Cir. 1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ronald Dean Combs v. Ralph Coyle
See Norris v. Schotten, 146 F.3d 314, 323-24 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 935 , 119 S.Ct. 348 , 142 L.Ed.2d 287 (1998). 5 The presumption of correctness accorded to state court findings “only applies to basic, primary facts, and not to mixed questions of law and fact,” and it “applies to implicit findings of fact, logically deduced because of the trial court’s ability to adjudge the witnesses’ demeanor and credibility.” Groseclose v. Bell, 130 F.3d 1161, 1164 (6th Cir.1997) (quoting McQueen v. Scroggy, 99 F.3d 1302, 1310 (6th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1257 , 117 S.Ct.…
discussed
Cited "see"
Stacey Barker v. Joan Yukins, in Her Official Capacity as Warden of the Scott Correctional Facility
See McQueen v. Scroggy, 99 F.3d 1302, 1310 (6th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1257 , 117 S.Ct. 2422 , 138 L.Ed.2d 185 (1977). 11 We must further consider the substantive standards utilized when reviewing state court decisions which are challenged by filing a petition for a writ of habeas corpus.
cited
Cited "see"
Barker v. Yukins
See McQueen v. Scroggy, 99 F.3d 1302, 1310 (6th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1257 , 117 S.Ct. 2422 , 138 L.Ed.2d 185 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jones v. Jones
See McQueen v. Scroggy, 99 F.3d 1302, 1310 (6th Cir., 1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1257 , 117 S.Ct. 2422 , 138 L.Ed.2d 185 (1997); Smith v. Jago, 888 F.2d 399, 407 (6th Cir.1989) cert. denied, 495 U.S. 961 , 110 S.Ct. 2572 , 109 L.Ed.2d 754 , Nevers, 990 F.Supp. at 850 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cummings v. Harrison
As noted by the Supreme Court, “[t]he absence of serious injury is therefore relevant to the Eighth Amendment inquiry, but does not end it.” 503 U.S. at 7 , 112 S.Ct. at 999 ; see also Harris v. Chapman, 97 F.3d 499, 505 (11th Cir.1996) , cert. denied 520 U.S. 1257 , 117 S.Ct. 2422 , 138 L.Ed.2d 185 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sutton v. Bell
Id. at 687-88 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 ; see also McQueen v. Scroggy, 99 F.3d 1302, 1310-11 (6th Cir.1996), ce rt. denied, 520 U.S. 1257 , 117 S.Ct. 2422 , 138 L.Ed.2d 185 (1997); Sims v. Livesay, 970 F.2d 1575, 1579-81 (6th Cir.1992); Flippins v. United States, 808 F.2d 16, 17-18 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1056 , 107 S.Ct. 2197 , 95 L.Ed.2d 852 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nichols v. Bell
Id. at 687-88 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 ; see also McQueen v. Scroggy, 99 F.3d 1302, 1310-11 (6th Cir.1996), ce rt. denied, 520 U.S. 1257 , 117 S.Ct. 2422 , 138 L.Ed.2d 185 (1997); Sims v. Livesay, 970 F.2d 1575, 1579-81 (6th Cir.1992); Flippins v. United States, 808 F.2d 16, 17-18 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1056 , 107 S.Ct. 2197 , 95 L.Ed.2d 852 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Osborne
Id. at 687-88 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 ; see also McQueen v. Scroggy, 99 F.3d 1302, 1310-11 (6th Cir.1996), ce rt. denied, 520 U.S. 1257 , 117 S.Ct. 2422 , 138 L.Ed.2d 185 (1997); Sims v. Livesay, 970 F.2d 1575, 1579-81 (6th Cir.1992); Flippins v. United States, 808 F.2d 16, 17-18 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1056 , 107 S.Ct. 2197 , 95 L.Ed.2d 852 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Antoine L. Bracken v. Dave Dormire
(2×)
Compare Jackson, 378 U.S. at 394 (holding that trial court must determine whether the confession was voluntary before admitting it into evidence), and Sims, 385 U.S. at 544 ("[The judge's] conclusion that the confession is voluntary must appear from the record with unmistakable clarity."), with Reese v. Delo, 94 F.3d 1177, 1183 (8th Cir. 1996) ("In determining whether a confession is voluntary, we consider the totality of the circumstances."), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1257 (1997), and Hall v. Wolff, 539 F.2d 1146, 1150-51 (8th Cir. 1976) (citing expansive list of factors to be considered in eval…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Antoine Bracken v. Dave Dormire
Compare Jackson, 378 U.S. at 394 (holding that trial court must determine whether the confession was voluntary before admitting it into evidence), and Sims, 385 U.S. at 544 ("[The judge's] conclusion that the confession is voluntary must appear from the record with unmistakable clarity."), with Reese v. Delo, 94 F.3d 1177, 1183 (8th Cir. 1996) ("In determining whether a confession is voluntary, we consider the totality of the circumstances."), cert. denied, -7- 520 U.S. 1257 (1997), and Hall v. Wolff, 539 F.2d 1146, 1150-51 (8th Cir. 1976) (citing expansive list of factors to be considered in …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Harris
v.
Tennessee
v.
Tennessee
No. 96-8666.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 2, 1997.
Published
Citer courts: Eleventh Circuit (2) · N.D. Ohio (1)
Ct. Crim. App. Tenn. Certiorari denied.