Fanelli v. United States, 520 U.S. 1271 (1997). · Go Syfert
Fanelli v. United States, 520 U.S. 1271 (1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
9 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Heavrin (kywd, 2001-04-25)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Heavrin
W.D. Ky. · 2001 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
... due process bars courts from applying a novel construction of a criminal statute to conduct that neither the statute nor any prior judicial decision has fairly disclosed to be within its scope
discussed Cited "see" UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, — v. JOSE MENDEZ-MORALES, —
8th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
His brief succinctly summarizes the contention: “No judicial review, no prosecution.” Like other circuits, we have consistently held that “an error cannot render a proceeding fundamentally unfair unless that error resulted in prejudice.” Torres-Sanchez, 68 F.3d at 230 , citing United States v. Polanco-Gomez, 841 F.2d 235, 237 (8th Cir.1988); see United States v. Loaisiga, 104 F.3d 484 , 487 & n. 2 (1st Cir.) (collecting eases), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1271 , 117 S.Ct. 2447 , 138 L.Ed.2d 206 (1997).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Jose Mendez-Morales
8th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
His brief succinctly summarizes the contention: “No judicial review, no prosecution.” Like other circuits, we have consistently held that “an error cannot render a proceeding fundamentally unfair unless that error resulted in prejudice.” Torres- Sanchez, 68 F.3d at 230 , citing United States v. Polanco-Gomez, 841 F.2d 235, 237 (8th Cir. 1988); see United States v. Loaisiga, 104 F.3d 484 , 487 & n.2 (1st Cir.) (collecting cases), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1271 (1997).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Fanelli
v.
United States
No. 96-8933.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 9, 1997.
520 U.S. 1271

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.