green
Positive treatment
7.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 30 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Johnson v. Allegheny Intermediate Unit
See [E.B. v. Verniero, 119 F.3d 1077, 1101 (3rd Cir.1997), ce rt. denied, 522 U.S. 1110 , 118 S.Ct. 1039 , 140 L.Ed.2d 105 (1998)]....”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hendricks v. OFFICE OF THE CLERMONT COUNTY SHERIFF
See Blankenship v. Parke Care Centers, Inc., 123 F.3d 868, 872 (6th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1110 , 118 S.Ct. 1039 , 140 L.Ed.2d 105 (1998); Fleenor v. Hewitt Soap Co., 81 F.3d 48, 50 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 863 , 117 S.Ct. 170 , 136 L.Ed.2d 112 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Miller
N.J.S.A. 2C:7-1 et seq.; see E.B. v. Verniero, 119 F.3d 1077, 1081 (3d Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1110 , 118 S.Ct. 1039 , 140 L.Ed.2d 105 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Helman v. State
See generally E.B. v. Verniero, 3d Cir., 119 F.3d 1077, 1082-83 (1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1109 , 118 S.Ct. 1039 , 140 L.Ed.2d 105 (1998) (describing sex offender registration and community notification components of New Jersey’s Megan’s Law scheme).
discussed
Cited "see"
Biagro Western Sales, Inc. v. Helena Chemical Co.
See CVI/Beta Ventures, Inc. v. Tura LP, 112 F.3d, 1146, 1153 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1109, 118 S.Ct. 1039 , 140 L.Ed.2d 105 (1998) (quoting Hoechst Celanese Corp. v. BP Chemicals, Ltd., 78 F.3d 1575, 1578 (Fed.Cir.1996)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lile v. Simmons
See E.B. v. Ver niero, 119 F.3d 1077 (3d Cir.1997) (community registration), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1109 , 118 S.Ct. 1039 , 140 L.Ed.2d 105 (1998); *1275 Doe v. Poritz, 142 N.J. 1 , 662 A.2d 367 (1995) (same); Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 486 , 92 S.Ct. 2593 , 33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972) (parole revocation).
discussed
Cited "see"
Duggins v. Steak 'N Shake, Inc.
See Blankenship v. Parke Care Centers, Inc. 123 F.3d 868, 871 (6th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1110 , 118 S.Ct. 1039 , 140 L.Ed.2d 105 (1998), citing Kauffman v. Allied Signal, Inc., 970 F.2d 178, 182 (6th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1041 , 113 S.Ct. 831 , 121 L.Ed.2d 701 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Misiorski
“Constitutional privacy interests are implicated . . . because . . . [t]he damage to [citizens’] reputations resulting from [disclosure] stigmatizes them as currently dangerous sex offenders, can harm their earning capacities, and can cause them to be objects of derision in the community.” Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Board, 428 Mass. 90 , 101 n.12, 697 N.E.2d 512 (1998); accord E.B. v. Verniero, 119 F.3d 1077, 1105-1106 (3d Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1109 , 118 S. Ct. 1039 , 140 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Williams
(2×)
See E.B. v. Verniero, 119 F.3d 1077, 1081 (3d Cir.1997), cert. denied,-U.S.-, 118 S.Ct. 1039 , 140 L.Ed.2d 105 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. CM
(2×)
See E.B. v. Verniero, 119 F.3d 1077 (3rd Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1110 , 118 S.Ct. 1039 , 140 L.Ed.2d 105 (1998) (New Jersey); Doe v. Gregoire, 960 F.Supp. 1478 (W.D.Wash. 1997) (Washington); Roe v. Office of Adult Probation, 125 F.3d 47 (2d Cir.1997) (Connecticut); Doe v. Pataki, 940 F.Supp. 603 (S.D.N.Y.1996), aff'd in part, rev'd in part, 120 F.3d 1263 (2nd Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1122 , 118 S.Ct. 1066 , 140 L.Ed.2d 126 (1998) (New York); Doe v. Weld, 954 F.Supp. 425 (D.Mass.1996) (Massachusetts).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. C.M.
(2×)
See E.B. v. Verniero, 119 F.3d 1077 (3rd Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1110 , 118 S.Ct. 1039 , 140 L.Ed.2d 105 (1998) (New Jersey); Doe v. Gregoire, 960 F.Supp. 1478 (W.D.Wash.1997) (Washington); Roe v. Office of Adult Probation, 125 F.3d 47 (2d Cir.1997) (Connecticut); Doe v. Pataki, 940 F.Supp. 603 (S.D.N.Y.1996), aff'd in part, rev’d in part, 120 F.3d 1263 (2nd Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1122 , 118 S.Ct. 1066 , 140 L.Ed.2d 126 (1998) (New York); Doe v. Weld, 954 F.Supp. 425 (D.Mass.1996) (Massachusetts).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cordero
See United States v. Farrish, 122 F.3d 146, 148-49 (2d Cir. 1997), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 66 U.S.L.W. 3555 (U.S. Feb. 23, 1997) (No. 97-1136); United States v. Atcheson, 94 F.3d 1237, 1241-42 (9th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 66 U.S.L.W. 3586 (U.S. Feb. 24, 1997) (No. 96-7644); United States v. Bolton, 68 F.3d at 398-99 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Doe v. Pataki
See E.B. v. Verniero, 119 F.3d 1077, 1107 (3d Cir.1997), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 118 S.Ct. 1039 , 140 L.Ed.2d 105 (1998); cf. Fusari v. Steinberg, 419 U.S. 379, 389 , 95 S.Ct. 533 , 42 L.Ed.2d 521 (1975) (noting that “the possible length of wrongful deprivation ... is an important factor in assessing the impact of official action on the private interests”). b.
discussed
Cited "see"
Collie v. State
See E.B. v. Verniero, 119 F.3d 1077 (3rd Cir.1997), cert. denied, 66 U.S.L.W. 3399 , ___ U.S. ___, 118 S.Ct. 1039 , 140 L.Ed.2d 105 (1998) (holding that New Jersey's Megan's Law, which established sexual offender registration and community notification provisions, was nonpunitive and did not violate the double jeopardy or ex post facto clauses).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dorricott v. Fairhill Center for Aging
See Blankenship v. Parke Care Ctrs., Inc., 123 F.3d 868, 872 (6th Cir.1997), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 118 S.Ct. 1039 , 140 L.Ed.2d 105 (1998); Black v. Zaring Homes, Inc., 104 F.3d 822, 825-26 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 118 S.Ct. 172 , 139 L.Ed.2d 114 (1997); Crawford v. Medina Gen.
discussed
Cited "see"
Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-Cross
See CVI/Beta Ventures, Inc. v. Tura LP, 112 F.3d 1146, 1157-58 , 1160 n. 7, 42 USPQ2d 1577, 1585, 1587 n. 7 (Fed.Cir.1997) (finding error in a claim construction that had been affirmed in an earlier appeal), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 1039 , 140 L.Ed.2d 105 (1998) 4 Claim interpretation, problem II: As soon as the trial court issues a claim interpretation, both sides often seek to shift their original claim interpretations to accommodate the judge's views.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Tribune Co.
See, e.g., In re Ambanc La Mesa L.P., 115 F.3d 650 , 656 (9th Cir.1997) cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1110 , 118 S.Ct. 1039 , 140 L.Ed.2d 105 (1998).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Tribune Co.
See, e.g., In re Ambanc La Mesa L.P., 115 F.3d 650 , 656 (9th Cir.1997) cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1110 , 118 S.Ct. 1039 , 140 L.Ed.2d 105 (1998).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Thomas a v. Dura Automotive Systems, Inc. (In Re Dura Automotive Systems, Inc.)
See, e.g., In re Ambanc La Mesa L.P., 115 F.3d 650 , 656 (9th Cir.1997) cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1110 , 118 S.Ct. 1039 , 140 L.Ed.2d 105 (1998).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Doe v. District Attorney
See, e.g., E.B. v. Verniero, 119 F.3d 1077, 1104 (3d Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1109 , 118 S.Ct. 1039 , 140 L.Ed.2d 105 (1998). .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Mannatech, Inc. v. Glycobiotics International, Inc.
Id. at 1582-83 ; see also CVI/Beta Ventures, Inc. v. Tura LP., 112 F.3d 1146, 1158 (Fed.Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1109 , 118 S.Ct. 1039 , 140 L.Ed.2d 105 (1998).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Exide Technologies
See, e.g., In re Ambanc La Mesa L.P., 115 F.3d 650 , 656 (9th Cir.1997) cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1110 , 118 S.Ct. 1039 , 140 L.Ed.2d 105 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Lernout & Hauspie Speech Products, N.V.
See, e.g., In re Ambanc La Mesa L.P., 115 F.3d 650 , 656 (9th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1110 , 118 S.Ct. 1039 , 140 L.Ed.2d 105 (1998); In re Jim Beck, Inc., 214 B.R. 305, 307 (W.D.Va.1997), aff'd, 162 F.3d 1155 (4th Cir.1998); In re Salem Suede, Inc., 219 B.R. 922, 933 (Bankr.D.Mass.1998) (“if the plan protects the legal rights of a *661 dissenting class in a manner consistent with the treatment of other classes whose legal rights are intertwined with those of the dissenting class, then the plan does not discriminate unfairly”) (quoting Kenneth N. Klee, “All You Ever Wanted to K…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harris v. New York State Department of Health
And one circuit court has described the principle as “a combination of the abstention and res judicata doctrines-” U.S. v. Owens, 54 F.3d 271, 274 (6th Cir.) cert. dismissed, 516 U.S. 983 , 116 S.Ct. 492 , 133 L.Ed.2d 418 (1995); see also E.B. v. Verniero, 119 F.3d 1077, 1091 (3d Cir.1997) (referring to “Rooker-Feldman abstention”), cert denied, 522 U.S. 1109 , 118 S.Ct. 1039 , 140 L.Ed.2d 105 (1998).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Genesis Health Ventures, Inc.
See, e.g., In re Ambanc La Mesa L.P., 115 F.3d 650 , 656 (9th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1110 , 118 S.Ct. 1039 , 140 L.Ed.2d 105 (1998).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Microsoft Corp. v. Compusource Distributors, Inc.
R.Civ.P. 56(c); see also Blankenship v. Parke Care Centers, 123 F.3d 868 , 871-72 (6th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1110 , 118 S.Ct. 1039 , 140 L.Ed.2d 105 , (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Greate Bay Hotel & Casino, Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., In re Ambanc La Mesa L.P., 115 F.3d 650 , 656 (9th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1110 , 118 S.Ct. 1039 , 140 L.Ed.2d 105 (1998); In re Jim Beck, Inc., 214 B.R. 305, 307 (W.D.Va.1997), aff'd, 162 F.3d 1155 (4th Cir.1998); In re Salem Suede, Inc., 219 B.R. 922, 933 (Bankr.D.Mass.1998) (“if the plan protects the legal rights of a dissenting class in a manner consistent with the treatment of other classes whose legal rights are intertwined with those of the dissenting class, then the plan does not discriminate unfairly”) (quoting Kenneth N. Klee, “All You Ever Wanted to Know A…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Auge v. NJ DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS
When a claim is made that a monetary assessment violates the Ex Post Facto Clause of Article I or the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, the threshold question is whether the assessment constitutes a "criminal punishment." Hudson v. United States, 522 U.S. 93 , ___, 118 S.Ct. 488, 493 , 139 L.Ed. 2d 450, 458-59 (1997); Kansas v. Hendricks, 521 U.S. 346, 367-71 , 117 S.Ct. 2072, 2085-86 , 138 L.Ed. 2d 501, 519-21 (1997); Department of Revenue of Montana v. Kurth Ranch, 511 U.S. 767 , 114 S.Ct. 1937 , 128 L.Ed. 2d 767 (1994); see also E.B. v. Vernier…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Marilyn H. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee
See also, Blankenship v. Parke Care Centers, Inc., 123 F.3d 868, 872 (6th Cir.1997), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1039 , 140 L.Ed.2d 105 (1998); Fleenor v. Hewitt Soap Co., 81 F.3d 48, 50 (6th Cir.1996) (the standard “is one of failure-to-correct-after-notice or duty to act after knowledge of harm”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Klemencic v. Ohio State University
See, e.g., Blankenship v. Parke Care Centers, Inc., 128 F.3d 868, 873-75 (6th Cir.1997) (regarding employer’s duty to remedy co-worker hostile environment harassment under Title VII, which was compared to a deliberate indifference standard), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 118 S.Ct. 1039 , 140 L.Ed.2d 105 (1998).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Abromson
v.
American Pacific Corp.
v.
American Pacific Corp.
No. 97-916.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 23, 1998.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.