green
Positive treatment
5.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Owens v. Campbell
See Norris v. Schotten, 146 F.3d 314, 335 (6th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 935 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Joseph v. Coyle
See Norris v. Schotten, 146 F.3d 314, 334 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 935 (1998). 22 Forest testified that Joseph and Bulerin had access to Visqueen (the material in which Young’s body was found) at the sand and gravel lot, that Joseph’s and Bulerin’s demeanors were unusual the morning after the kidnapping, that Bulerin changed the tires on Forest’s car the morning after the murder, that a knife was kept in Forest’s car and was in the car on the day of the murder, that Joseph and Bulerin kept a shovel in Forest’s car, and that Joseph owned a black ninja mask like the one dis…
cited
Cited "see"
Richard Joseph, Petitioner-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Ralph Coyle, Warden, Respondent-Appellee/cross-Appellant
See Norris v. Schotten, 146 F.3d 314, 334 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 935 , 119 S.Ct. 348 , 142 L.Ed.2d 287 (1998). 22 .
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Federated Department Stores, Inc., Debtor. Christopher Spierer Marion Spierer v. Federated Department Stores, Inc. Allied Stores Corporation Bloomingdales Department Stores, Inc.
See Norris v. Schotten, 146 F.3d 314, 325-26 (6th Cir.) (emphasizing importance of Article III review of federal magistrate judges' decisions), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 935 , 119 S.Ct. 348 , 142 L.Ed.2d 287 (1998); Richard H.
discussed
Cited "see"
Spierer v. Federated Department Stores, Inc. (In re Federated Department Stores, Inc.)
See Norris v. Schotten, 146 F.3d 314, 325-26 (6th Cir.) (emphasizing importance of Article III review of federal magistrate judges’ decisions), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 935 , 119 S.Ct. 348 , 142 L.Ed.2d 287 (1998); Richard H.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ronald Dean Combs v. Ralph Coyle
(2×)
See Norris v. Schotten, 146 F.3d 314, 323-24 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 935 , 119 S.Ct. 348 , 142 L.Ed.2d 287 (1998). 5 The presumption of correctness accorded to state court findings “only applies to basic, primary facts, and not to mixed questions of law and fact,” and it “applies to implicit findings of fact, logically deduced because of the trial court’s ability to adjudge the witnesses’ demeanor and credibility.” Groseclose v. Bell, 130 F.3d 1161, 1164 (6th Cir.1997) (quoting McQueen v. Scroggy, 99 F.3d 1302, 1310 (6th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1257 , 117 S.Ct.…
cited
Cited "see"
Hines v. Louisiana
See Humphrey v. Cain, 138 F.3d 552 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 935 , 119 S.Ct. 348 , 142 L.Ed.2d 287 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bennett v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institute
Cf. Hutchison v. Marshall, 744 F.2d 44, 45-46 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1221 , 105 S.Ct. 1208 , 84 L.Ed.2d 350 (1985); see also Norris v. Schotten, 146 F.3d 314, 328-29 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 935 , 119 S.Ct. 348 , 142 L.Ed.2d 287 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Card v. United States
(2×)
See Bellanger v. United States, 548 A.2d 501 , 503 & n. 6 (D.C.1988) (citing United States v. Ingraldi, 793 F.2d 408, 411-12 (1st Cir.1986) (due process requirements met where Brady material disclosed after beginning of trial, if accused not prejudiced in preparing and presenting his case)); see also Norris v. Schotten, 146 F.3d 314, 334 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 935 , 119 S.Ct. 348 , 142 L.Ed.2d 287 (1998) (Brady does not generally apply to “a tardy disclosure” but rather to “a complete failure to disclose”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Zuern v. Tate
See e.g., Norris v. Schotten, 146 F.3d 314, 322 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 935 , 119 S.Ct. 348 , 142 L.Ed.2d 287 (1998); Arredondo v. United States, 120 F.3d 639, 640 (6th Cir.1997).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
DePew v. Anderson
See e.g., Norris v. Schotten, 146 F.3d 314, 322 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 935 , 119 S.Ct. 348 , 142 L.Ed.2d 287 (1998); Arredondo v. United States, 120 F.3d 639, 640 (6th Cir.1997).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dread
v.
Maryland State Police
v.
Maryland State Police
No. 98-5557.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 13, 1998.
525 U.S. 935
Published
Ct. Sp. App. Md. Certiorari denied.