green
Positive treatment
9.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Mitchell
See Commonwealth v. Emerson, 430 Mass. 378, 384 (1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1030 (2000); Amirault, supra; Commonwealth v. Murphy, 86 Mass. App. Ct. 118, 126 (2014).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Correia
See Commonwealth v. Emerson, 430 Mass. 378, 382 (1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1030 (2000); Commonwealth v. Gilbert, 377 Mass. 887, 895-896 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Murphy
See Commonwealth v. Emerson, 430 Mass. 378, 384 (1999), cert, denied, 529 U.S. 1030 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Martin
See Commonwealth v. Emerson, 430 Mass. 378, 380-381 (1999), cert, denied, 529 U.S. 1030 (2000), quoting from Com monwealth v. Baldwin, 385 Mass. 165, 175 (1982) (“Even where there has been insufficient disclosure, we look to see ‘whether, given a timely disclosure, the defense would have been able to prepare and present its case in such a manner as to create a reasonable doubt that would not otherwise have existed’ ”). 3.
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Lopes
See Commonwealth v. Emerson, 430 Mass. 378, 384 (1999), cert, denied, 529 U.S. 1030 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Sleeper
See Commonwealth v. Emerson, 430 Mass. 378, 384 (1999), cert, denied, 529 U.S. 1030 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
COMMONWEALTH v. MARKEESE MITCHELL (And Two Companion Cases)
See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Emerson, 430 Mass. 378, 384 (1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1030 (2000). [18] One passage of Amirault, 399 Mass. at 625 , refers to this as the defendant's burden to show "that prejudice resulted from the dishonesty." The term "prejudice" is often used in the context of a defendant's burden to demonstrate harm from an established error of law (e.g., "prejudicial error").
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gurmeet Singh Dhinsa
In making this determination, courts examine, inter alia, whether the defendant exercised dominion and control “over the premises in which the firearms are located.” United States v.. Layne, 192 F.3d 556, 571 (6th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1029 , 120 S.Ct. 1443 , 146 L.Ed.2d 330 (2000); see also United States v. Adkins, 196 F.3d 1112, 1118 (10th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1030 , 120 S.Ct. 1446 , 146 L.Ed.2d 333 (2000); United States v. Wight, 968 F.2d 1393, 1398 (1st Cir.1992) (collecting cases).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ortega
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 99-8189.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 20, 2000.
529 U.S. 1030
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.