discussed Cited "see, e.g." Butler v. Robar Enterprises, Inc. See also Wayne v. Jarvis, 197 F.3d 1098,1102-04 (11th Cir.1999) (analyzing motion to amend complaint to substitute named defendant for Doe defendant pursuant to Rule 15(c)(3)), cert, denied 529 U.S. 1115 , 120 S.Ct. 1974 , 146 L.Ed.2d 804 (2000); Baskin v. City of Des Plaines, 138 F.3d 701, 703-04 (7th Cir.1998) (same); Bass v. World Wrestling Fed’n Entm’t, Inc., 129 F.Supp.2d 491 , 507 n. 12 (E.D.N.Y.2001): Rule 15(c)(3) explicitly addresses the situation involving changing defendants, and incorporates the requirements of Rule 15(c)(2) as a necessary prerequisite to Rule 15(c)(3).