Alford v. United States Dist. Court for the E. Dist. of Pennsylvania, 529 U.S. 1134 (2000). · Go Syfert
Search
Alford v. United States Dist. Court for the E. Dist. of Pennsylvania, 529 U.S. 1134 (2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
28 citation events (28 in the last 25 years) across 13 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Evans v. State (md, 2006-12-19)
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Evans v. State (2×)
Md. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Hairston, 133 Idaho 496 , 988 P.2d 1170, 1192 (1999) (rejecting claim based solely on statistical study demonstrating that state's death penalty is applied significantly more often in urban counties), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1134 , 120 S.Ct. 2014 , 146 L.Ed.2d 963 (2000). [12] *67 The result in Maryland should be no different than the consensus around the country.
discussed Cited "see" Benge v. Johnson
S.D. Ohio · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hill v. Brigano, 199 F.3d 833, 847 (6th Cir.1999)(holding that strength of competent proof to establish guilt is one of four factors to consider when determining, in response to allegation of prosecutorial misconduct, overall fairness of trial), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1134 , 120 S.Ct. 2015 , 146 L.Ed.2d 964 (2000).
cited Cited "see" State v. Yager
Idaho · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Hairston, 133 Idaho 496, 506 , 988 P.2d 1170, 1180 (1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1134 , 120 S.Ct. 2014 , 146 L.Ed.2d 963 (2000).
cited Cited "see" State v. McLeod
La. Ct. App. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Penns, 99-2916 (La.12/20/99), 758 So.2d 776 , cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1134 , 120 S.Ct. 2014 , 146 L.Ed.2d 963 (2000).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Shatzer v. State (2×)
Md. · 2008 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Hill v. Brigano, 199 F.3d 833, 842 (6th Cir.1999) ("Taking into account both the time lapse between the impermissible interrogation and the incriminating statements by the defendant and the fact that the defendant was aware that he had been assigned counsel, we believe the trial court was correct in analyzing the admissibility of this evidence under the initiation exception to Edwards”), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1134 , 120 S.Ct. 2015 , 146 L.Ed.2d 964 (2000); Perrine v. State, 919 So.2d 520, 524-25 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.2005) (stating that since “either a break in custody or a lapse of…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Alford
v.
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
No. 99-8738.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 22, 2000.
529 U.S. 1134
Published

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.