O'Guinn v. Cortez Masto, 568 U.S. 904 (2012). · Go Syfert
Search
O'Guinn v. Cortez Masto, 568 U.S. 904 (2012). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
17 citation events (17 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Pickard (ca10, 2013-11-05)
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" United States v. Pickard
10th Cir. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ochoa v. Workman, 669 F.3d 1130 , 1146 n. 15 (10th Cir.2012), ce rt. denied, - U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 321 , 184 L.Ed.2d 190 (2012). 2 .
discussed Cited "see" Case v. Hatch
10th Cir. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ochoa v. Workman, 669 F.3d 1130, 1140-43 (10th Cir.) (upholding district court’s determination that the state prisoner met § 2244(b)(2)(A)’s procedural requirements), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 321 , 184 L.Ed.2d 190 (2012).
discussed Cited "see" Case v. Hatch
10th Cir. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ochoa v. Workman, 669 F.3d 1130, 1140-43 (10th Cir.) (upholding district court’s determination that the state prisoner met § 2244(b)(2)(A)’s procedural requirements), cert. denied, 133 S. Ct. 321 (2012).
discussed Cited "see" Case v. Hatch (2×)
10th Cir. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ochoa v. Workman, 669 F.3d 1130, 1140-43 (10th Cir.) (upholding district court’s determination that the state prisoner met § 2244(b)(2)(A)’s procedural requirements), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 321 , 184 L.Ed.2d 190 (2012).
discussed Cited "see" Shirley v. Davis (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
10th Cir. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See id. (“[I]t is difficult to tell whether the instant action is properly brought under § 2254 as a challenge to the validity of [the petitioner’s] conviction and sentence or pursuant to § 2241 as an attack on the execution of his sentence.”).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Brawley
Conn. · 2016 · signal: see also · confidence low
Ed. 2d 1096 (2009); see also Ochoa v. Workman, 669 F.3d 1130, 1145 (10th Cir.) (‘‘it is the potential impact on the jury of visible restraints that implicates the fundamental fairness of a jury trial proceed- ing’’), cert. denied, U.S. , 133 S. Ct. 321 , 184 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Shirley v. Davis
10th Cir. · 2013 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc., 514 U.S. 211, 228 , 115 S.Ct. 1447 , 131 L.Ed.2d 328 (1995) ("The rules of finality, both statutory and judge made, treat a dismissal on statute-of-limitations grounds the same way they treat a dismissal for failure to state a claim, for failure to prove substantive liability, or for failure to prosecute: as a judgment on the merits.”); Murphy v. Klein Tools, Inc., 935 F.2d 1127, 1128-29 (10th Cir.1991) (holding that "a dismissal on limitations grounds is a judgment on the merits”); see also Quezada v. Smith, 624 F.3d 514, 519-20 (2d Cir.2010) (“We ho…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
O'Guinn
v.
Cortez Masto, Attorney General of Nevada
No. 12-5283.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 2012.
568 U.S. 904
Published

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.