discussed Cited "see" State v. Cargill See United States v. Doyle, 678 F.3d 429 (6th Cir.2012), cert. denied, ____ U.S. ____, 133 S.Ct. 456 , 184 L.Ed.2d (2012); United States v. Rogers, 481 Fed.Appx. 250 (6th Cir.2012), cert. denied, ____ U.S. ____, 133 S.Ct. 456 , 184 L.Ed.2d (2012). {¶39} Finally, Cargill argued that he was deprived of the “benefit of his plea bargain” because he pleaded guilty to a crime that had “mandatory probation.” But Cargill did not lose the benefit of his plea bargain; if he had been convicted of his original indictment, he would have faced a possible prison sentence ranging from 9 to 36 months …