Andrade-Paromo v. Franke, 568 U.S. 1031 (2012).

Andrade-Paromo v. Franke, 568 U.S. 1031 (2012). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite

green Positive treatment 2.2 score

2 citation events across 2 distinct courts.

Strongest positive: Barnum v. City of Tulsa (ca10, 2014-02-06)

Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Barnum v. City of Tulsa

10th Cir. · 2014 · signal: compare · confidence low

Compare Meilleur v. Strong, 682 F.3d 56, 63 (2d Cir.) (“If a plaintiff proceeding IFP chooses to rely on the Marshals to serve the relevant parties, and it becomes apparent that the Marshals will not accomplish this by the Rule 4(m) or court-ordered deadline, she must advise the district court that she is relying on the Marshals to effect service and request a further extension of time for them to do so.”), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 133 S.Ct. 655 , 184 L.Ed.2d 467 (2012), with Wright v. First Student, Inc., 710 F.3d 782, 783 (8th Cir.2013) (per curiam) (“[I]f the delay in service was t…