green
Positive treatment
3.2 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams v. Buenrostro
See id. 4 The Court must draw all inferences in the light most favorable to the nonmoving 5 party and determine whether a genuine issue of material fact precludes entry of judgment. 6 See Comite de Jornaleros de Redondo Beach v. City of Redondo Beach, 657 F.3d 936 , 7 942 (9th Cir. 2011) (quotation marks and citation omitted), cert. denied, 132 S. Ct. 1566 8 (2012).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lone Star Security & Video, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles
See Comite de Jornaleros de Redondo Beach v. City of Redondo Beach, 657 F.3d 936, 945 (9th Cir.2011) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1566 , 182 L.Ed.2d 168 (2012) (“[T]he government may impose reasonable restrictions on the time, place, or manner of protected speech, provided the restrictions are justified without refer *507 ence to the content of the regulated speech, that they are narrowly tailored to serve a significant governmental interest, and that they leave open ample alternative channels for communication of the information.” (quotation marks and citation omitted)).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McKinley
v.
Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
v.
Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
No. 11-7851.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 21, 2012.
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.