green
Positive treatment
4.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 2012 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2012
2019
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Sanchez, W.
See Ahmad, supra. In addition to the reasons listed, it is axiomatic that where “the sentencing court had the benefit of a [PSI], we can assume the sentencing court was aware of relevant information regarding the defendant’s character and weighed those considerations along with mitigating statutory factors.” Commonwealth v. Rhoades, 8 A.3d 912, 919 (Pa. Super. 2010) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted), appeal denied, 25 A.3d 328 (Pa. 2011), cert. denied, Rhoades v. Pennsylvania, 132 S. Ct. 1746 (2012).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Hamilton
County Court then engaged in the requisite inquiry, examining defendant’s “education, occupation, previous exposure to legal procedures and other relevant factors bearing on a competent, intelligent, voluntary waiver” (People v Smith, 92 NY2d 516, 520 [1998]; see People v Crampe, 17 NY3d 469, 481 [2011], cert denied 565 US —, 132 S Ct 1746 [2012]).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Hamilton
County Court then engaged in the requisite inquiry, examining defendant’s “education, occupation, previous exposure to legal procedures and other relevant factors bearing on a competent, intelligent, voluntary waiver” (People v Smith, 92 NY2d 516, 520 [1998]; see People v Crampe, 17 NY3d 469, 481 [2011], cert denied 565 US —, 132 S Ct 1746 [2012]).
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. McNamara, J.
See Commonwealth v. Rhoades, 8 A.3d 912, 918-819 (Pa. Super. 2010) (“[A]n allegation that the sentencing court failed to consider mitigating factors generally does not raise a substantial question for our review.”), appeal denied, 25 A.3d 328 (Pa. 2011), cert. denied, 132 S.Ct. 1746 (U.S. 2012).
discussed
Cited "see"
CHANDLER, SAMUEL, PEOPLE v
“If a timely and unequivocal request has been asserted, then the trial court is obligated to conduct a ‘searching inquiry’ to ensure that the defendant’s waiver is knowing, intelligent, and voluntary” (Matter of Kathleen K. [Steven K.], 17 NY3d 380, 385 ; see People v Crampe, 17 NY3d 469, 481-482 , cert denied ___ US___, 132 S Ct 1746 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Holkesvig
v.
Moore
v.
Moore
No. 11-867.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 19, 2012.
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.