green
Positive treatment
6.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 2012 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2012
2019
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Damian Lamon Murkledove v. State
Marable v. State, 85 S.W.3d 287 , 287 & n. 2 (Tex.Crim.App.2002) (collecting cases); see Adames v. State, 353 S.W.3d 854, 861 (Tex.Crim.App.2011) (reaffirming that state and federal law both specify that due process does not require defendant’s culpability as a party to be plead in charging instrument), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1763 , 182 L.Ed.2d 533 (2012).
cited
Cited "see"
Derrick Lynn Lewis v. State
See Adames v. State, 353 S.W.3d 854, 861-62 (Tex.Crim.App.2011), cert. denied, 2012 U.S. LEXIS 2268 , 132 S.Ct. 1763 , 182 L.Ed.2d 533 (2012).
cited
Cited "see"
Andre Nathaniel Hamilton v. State
See Adames v. State, 353 S.W.3d 854, 861-62 (Tex.Crim.App.2011), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 132 S.Ct. 1763 , 182 L.Ed.2d 533 (2012).
cited
Cited "see"
Derrick Lynn Lewis v. State
See Adames v. State, 353 S.W.3d 854, 861-62 (Tex.Crim.App. 2011), cert. denied, 2012 U.S. LEXIS 2268 , 132 S.Ct. 1763 , 182 L.Ed.2d 533 (2012).
cited
Cited "see"
Andre Nathaniel Hamilton v. State
See Adames v. State, 353 S.W.3d 854, 861-62 (Tex.Crim.App. 2011), cert. denied, 2012 U.S. LEXIS 2268 , 132 S.Ct. 1763 , 182 L.Ed.2d 533 (2012).
cited
Cited "see"
Andre Nathaniel Hamilton v. State
See 9 Adames v. State, 353 S.W.3d 854, 861-62 (Tex.Crim.App. 2011), cert. denied, 2012 U.S. LEXIS 2268 , 132 S.Ct. 1763 , 182 L.Ed.2d 533 (2012).
discussed
Cited "see"
William Gilmore v. State
"The purpose of [the corpus delicti] rule is to ensure that a person is not convicted based solely upon his own extrajudicial false confession to a crime that never occurred." Menefee v. State, 287 S.W.3d 9, 21 (Tex.Crim.App. 2009) (Cochran, J., concurring); see Bible v. State, 162 S.W.3d 234, 246 (Tex.Crim.App. 2005) ("The corpus delicti doctrine requires that evidence independent of a defendant’s extrajudicial confession show that the 'essential nature’ of the charged crime was committed by someone.’’) (quoting Salazar v. State, 86 S.W.3d 640, 644-45 (Tex.Crim.App.2002)). 24 . ”[U]…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PNH, Inc.
v.
Alfa Laval Flow, Inc.
v.
Alfa Laval Flow, Inc.
No. 11-957.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 19, 2012.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.