Binney v. South Carolina, 546 U.S. 852 (2005). · Go Syfert
Search
Binney v. South Carolina, 546 U.S. 852 (2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “in denaturalization proceedings ... a court should only revoke citizenship if the government presents ‘clear, unequivocal, and convincing* evidence establishing that citizenship was illegally procured.”
11 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Alexander v. Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde (grrondectapp, 2016-08-05)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Alexander v. Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde
grrondectapp · 2016 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
in denaturalization proceedings ... a court should only revoke citizenship if the government presents 'clear, unequivocal, and convincing evidence establishing that citizenship was illegally procured.
discussed Cited "see" Jones v. State
Tex. App. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Keeter v. State, 175 S.W.3d 756, 759-61 (Tex.Crim.App.2005) (holding failure to raise alleged Brady error as a separate complaint during hearing on motion for new trial waives error), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 852 , 126 S.Ct. 114 , 163 L.Ed.2d 124 (2005); Williams v. State, 995 S.W.2d 754, 761-62 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1999, no pet.) (holding failure to request continuance based on alleged Brady violation waives error).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Binney
v.
South Carolina
No. 04-10455.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 2005.
546 U.S. 852
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 64%
Citer courts: Grand Ronde Court of Appeals (1)

Sup. Ct. S. C. Certiorari denied.