green
Positive treatment
2.1 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Schwartz v. Neal
Finally, contrary to Petitioner’s assertions, the twelve claims raised in his first § 2254 petition that were denied based on state procedural default grounds “eonstitute[d] a disposition on the merits and thus render[ed] a subsequent § 2254 petition or § 2255 motion ‘second or successive’ for purposes of the AEDPA.” Carter v. United States, 150 F.3d 202, 205-06 (2d Cir.1998) (per curiam); see Henderson v. Lampert, 396 F.3d 1049, 1053 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 884 , 126 S.Ct. 199 , 163 L.Ed.2d 189 (2005) (same); cf. Hawkins v. Evans, 64 F.3d 543, 547 (10th cir.1995) (conc…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Carlyle
v.
Social Security Administration
v.
Social Security Administration
No. 05-5122.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 2005.
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.