Santiago-Vazquez v. United States, 546 U.S. 924 (2005). · Go Syfert
Search
Santiago-Vazquez v. United States, 546 U.S. 924 (2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“i am hereby making this statement to the court through this affidavit: i do not wish to proceed with more and/or endless litigation.”
12 citation events (12 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Joseph E. Corcoran v. State of Indiana (ind, 2024-12-10)
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Joseph E. Corcoran v. State of Indiana (2×) also: Cited "see"
Ind. · 2024 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
i am hereby making this statement to the court through this affidavit: i do not wish to proceed with more and/or endless litigation.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Jekyll Island-State Park Authority v. Polygroup Macau Limited
S.D. Ga. · 2023 · confidence medium
Daimler, 571 U.S. at 118 (citing Goodyear, 546 U.S. at 924).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Saunders v. San Juan Construction Company
D. Haw. · 2020 · confidence medium
See Daimler, 571 U.S. at 137 ; Goodyear, 546 U.S. at 924.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Saunders v. San Juan Construction Company
D. Colo. · 2020 · confidence medium
See Daimler, 571 U.S. at 137 ; Goodyear, 546 U.S. at 924.
discussed Cited "see" Wrinkles v. State (2×)
Ind. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Baird v. State, 833 N.E.2d 28, 30 (Ind.2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 924 , 126 S.Ct. 312 , 163 L.Ed.2d 269 (2005).
cited Cited "see" Blanca Piedad Ortiz v. United States
11th Cir. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Varela v. United States, 400 F.3d 864, 867 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 924 , 126 S.Ct. 312 , 163 L.Ed.2d 269 (2005).
cited Cited "see" David Correa v. Warden FCC Coleman
11th Cir. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Varela v. United States, 400 F.3d 864, 868 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 924 , 126 S.Ct. 312 , 163 L.Ed.2d 269 (2005).
discussed Cited "see" Roy Mack West v. United States
11th Cir. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Lagrone, 727 F.2d 1037, 1038 (11th Cir.1984) (per curiam). ‘When reviewing a district court’s denial of a § 2255 motion, we review questions of law de novo and findings of fact for clear error.” Varela v. United States, 400 F.3d 864 , 867 n. 3 (11th Cir.) (per curiam) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 924 , 126 S.Ct. 312 , 163 L.Ed.2d 269 (2005).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Santiago-Vazquez, aka Corazon
v.
United States
No. 05-6054.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 2005.
546 U.S. 924
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 77%
Citer courts: Indiana Supreme Court (1)

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.