discussed Cited "see" United States v. Spear See United States v. Britt, 388 F.3d 1369, 1371 (11th Cir.2004), judgment vacated by 546 U.S. 930 , 126 S.Ct. 411 , 163 L.Ed.2d 313 (2005), and reinstated in relevant part by 437 F.3d 1103 (11th Cir.2006) (upholding application of § 3B1.3 where clerk for Social Security Administration had discretion to approve applications for Social Security Account Number cards).

discussed Cited "see" State v. Branch (2×) See North Carolina v. Branch, 126 S. Ct. 411 , 163 L.

discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Ghertler Compare, for example, Walker, 490 F.3d at 1300-01 (upholding enhancement for a state legislator who embezzled money from a charity he administered with “no oversight”), and United States v. Britt, 388 F.3d 1369 , 1372 *1267 (11th Cir.2004) (upholding enhancement for clerk of Social Security Administration who processed applications for Social Security cards and "was so loosely supervised that she was able, over a period spanning more than four years,” to commit fraud without detection), vacated on other grounds, 546 U.S. 930 , 126 S.Ct. 411 , 163 L.Ed.2d 313 (2005), reinstated in part, 4…