discussed Cited "see" State v. Sayles (Dissent) See Zappulla v. New York, 391 F.3d 462, 473 (2d Cir. 2004) (inculpatory admissions from defendant are ‘‘the most probative and damaging evidence that can be admitted against him’’ because they ‘‘come from the actor himself, the most knowledgeable and unimpeachable source of informa- tion about his past conduct’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 957 , 126 S. Ct. 472 , 163 L.

cited Cited "see" Securities & Exchange Commission v. Vassallo See U.S. v. Gordon, 393 F.3d 1044, 1057-59 (9th Cir.2004), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 957 , 126 S.Ct. 472 , 163 L.Ed.2d 359 (2005).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. ANGEL T. See, e.g., Zappulla v. New York, 391 F.3d 462, 471 (2d Cir. 2004) (considering jury deadlock in habeas petitioner’s first trial and lengthy deliberations in second trial in assessing strength of government’s case), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 957 , 126 S. Ct. 472 , 163 L.