green
Positive treatment
7.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Villanueva-Sotelo
(2×)
See United States v. Philip Morris USA Inc., 396 F.3d 1190, 1201 (D.C.Cir.) ("[W]e avoid creating circuit splits when possible. . . ."), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 960 , 126 S.Ct. 478 , 163 L.Ed.2d 363 (2005). [5] Its disagreement with the *1252 other circuits is two-fold: it first finds the language ambiguous, see Maj.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Miller
See State v. White, 145 N.H. 544, 548 (2000), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 932 (2001), petition for habeas corpus denied by White v. Coplan, 296 F. Supp. 2d 46 (D.N.H. 2003), vacated onfed’l constitutional grounds, 399 F.3d 18 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 478 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
Miriam W. Grier v. Secretary John W. Snow
See Cooper v. Southern Co., 390 F.3d 695, 740 (11th Cir. 2004), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 478 , 163 L.Ed.2d 363 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Osborne
(2×)
See State v. Recuenco, 154 Wash.2d 156 , 110 P.3d 188 (2005), cert. granted, ___ U.S. ___, 126 S.Ct. 478 , 163 L.Ed.2d 362 (2005). [1] In two recent cases, we have addressed and corrected Blakely errors in the interests of justice.
cited
Cited "see"
Sarah E. Hendrix v. John W. Snow
See Cooper v. Southern Co., 390 F.3d 695, 740 (11th Cir.2004), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 478 , 163 L.Ed.2d 363 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
Yvette Grady v. BellSouth
See Cooper v. Southern Co., 390 F.3d 695 , 724-25 & n. 16 (11th Cir.2004), (applying McDonnell Douglas framework to claims of intentional discrimination arising under Title VII and § 1981), cert denied, - U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 478 , 163 L.Ed.2d 363 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Womac
See State v. Recuenco, 154 Wn.2d 156 , 100 P.3d 188 , cert. granted,_U.S._, 126 S. Ct. 478 , 163 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Womac
See State v. Recuenco, 154 Wash.2d 156 , 110 P.3d 188 (2005), cert. granted, ___ U.S. ___, 126 S.Ct. 478 , 163 L.Ed.2d 362 (2005). [26] Hughes, 154 Wash.2d at 156 , 110 P.3d 192 . [27] State v. Corrado, 81 Wash.App. 640, 645-46 , 915 P.2d 1121 (1996) ("jeopardy should `terminate' when the State has had but not before the State has had one full and fair opportunity to prosecute"). [28] See State v. Gohl, 109 Wash.App. 817, 822 , 37 P.3d 293 (2001) ("The fact of multiple convictions, with the concomitant societal stigma and potential to increase sentence under recidivist statutes for any f…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Zimmerman
See State v. Recuenco, 154 Wash.2d 156, 164 , 110 P.3d 188 (2005), cert. granted, 2005 U.S. LEXIS 7658 , ___ U.S. ___, 126 S.Ct. 478 , 163 L.Ed.2d 362 , 2005 WL 1669366 (U.S. Oct. 17, 2005). [6] We do not apply the uncontroverted evidence test here.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Zimmerman
See State v. Recuenco, 154 Wn.2d 156, 164 , 110 P.3d 188 , cert. granted, 126 S. Ct. 478 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Capshaw v. Commonwealth
In interpreting the Confrontation Clause, the United States Supreme Court has “never held-or even suggested-that the longstanding rules restricting the use of specific instances and extrinsic evidence to impeach a witness’s credibility pose constitutional problems.” Hogan v. Hanks, 97 F.3d 189, 191 (7th Cir.1996), cert, denied, 520 U.S. 1171 , 117 S.Ct. 1439 , 137 L.Ed.2d 546 (1997); see also White v. Coplan, 399 F.3d 18, 25 (1st Cir.2005), cert, denied, 546 U.S. 972 , 126 S.Ct. 478 , 163 L.Ed.2d 384 (2005); Raines, 118 S.W.3d 205 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
O'Brien v. Marshall
Compare White v. Coplan, 399 F.3d 18, 24-25 (1st Cir.2005), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 478 , 163 L.Ed.2d 384 (2005).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Washington
v.
Recuenco
v.
Recuenco
No. 05-83.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 17, 2005.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Sup. Ct. Wash. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted.