Martins v. United States, 546 U.S. 1011 (2005). · Go Syfert
Search
Martins v. United States, 546 U.S. 1011 (2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“the restriction of the protective sweep doctrine only to circumstances involving arrests would jeopardize the safety of officers in contravention of the pragmatic concept of reasonableness embodied in the fourth amendment.”
17 citation events (17 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Torres-Castro (ca10, 2006-12-12)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Torres-Castro
10th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see, e.g. · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the restriction of the protective sweep doctrine only to circumstances involving arrests would jeopardize the safety of officers in contravention of the pragmatic concept of reasonableness embodied in the fourth amendment.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Godin
1st Cir. · 2007 · signal: see also · confidence low
See United States v. Ngo, 406 F.3d 839 , 843 n. 1 (7th Cir.2005); see also United States v. Martins, 413 F.3d 139, 152 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1011 , 126 S.Ct. 644 , 163 L.Ed.2d 520 (2005).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Victor Manuel Torres-Castro
10th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Martins, 413 F.3d 139, 150 (1st Cir.2005) (“[T]he key is the reasonableness of the belief that the officers’ safety or the safety of others may be at risk.”), cert denied - U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 644 , 163 L.Ed.2d 520 (2005); United States v. Miller, 430 F.3d 93, 100 (2d Cir.2005) (“The restriction of the protective sweep doctrine only to circumstances involving arrests would jeopardize the safety of officers in contravention of the pragmatic concept of reasonableness embodied in the Fourth Amendment.”); United States v. Gould, 364 F.3d 578, 584 (5th Cir.2004) …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Alfred G. Miller
2d Cir. · 2005 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Martins, 413 F.3d 139, 150 (1st Cir. 2005) (“We hold ... that police who have lawfully entered a residence possess the same right to conduct a protective sweep whether an arrest warrant, a search warrant, or the existence of exigent circumstances prompts their entry.”), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 644 , - L.Ed.2d - (2005); Leaf v. Shelnutt, 400 F.3d 1070, 1086-88 (7th Cir.2005) (“[I]t was not necessary for the officers to have made an arrest in order for their search of the apartment to be justified; the only question is whether the search was objectivel…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Martins
v.
United States
No. 05-6934.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 7, 2005.
546 U.S. 1011
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 88%
Citer courts: Tenth Circuit (1)

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.