green
Positive treatment
10.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. James, V.
See Commonwealth v. Bromley, 862 A.2d 598 (Pa.Super. 2004), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1095 , 126 S.Ct. 1089 , 163 L.Ed.2d 863 (2006) (explaining claim that court failed to state reasons on record for sentence challenges discretionary aspects of sentencing).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Graham
(2×)
"Furthermore, it is well-settled that uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice may support a conviction in federal court." United States v. Spearman, 186 F.3d 743, 746 (6th Cir.) (citing, *449 inter alia, Krulewitch v. United States, 336 U.S. 440, 454 , 69 S.Ct. 716 , 93 L.Ed. 790 (1949)), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1033 , 120 S.Ct. 560 , 145 L.Ed.2d 435 (1999); accord United States v. Owens, 426 F.3d 800, 808 (6th Cir.2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1119 , 126 S.Ct. 1089 , 163 L.Ed.2d 905 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Gordon
(2×)
See generally Commonwealth v. Bromley, 862 A.2d 598, 603 (Pa.Super.2004), appeal denied, 584 Pa. 684 , 881 A.2d 818 (2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1095 , 126 S.Ct. 1089 , 163 L.Ed.2d 863 (2006).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sanchez-Garcia
See United States v. Treto-Martinez, 421 F.3d *1211 1156, 1157-58 (10th Cir.2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1118 , 126 S.Ct. 1089 , 163 L.Ed.2d 904 (2006).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Howard
See United States v. Rines, 419 F.3d 1104, 1106-07 (10th Cir.), cert, denied — U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 1089 , 163 L.Ed.2d 905 (2006).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Thornton
See United States v. Rines, 419 F.3d 1104, 1106 (10th Cir.2005), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 1089 , 163 L.Ed.2d 905 (2006). 18 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Banda
See United States v. Rines, 419 F.3d 1104, 1106 (10th Cir.2005), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 1089 , — L.Ed.2d-(2006); see also United States v. Wade, 435 F.3d 829, 832 (8th Cir.2006); United States v. Vaughn, 430 F.3d 518, 524 (2d Cir.2005); United States v. Dupas, 417 F.3d 1064, 1068 (9th Cir.), amended, 419 F.3d 916 (9th Cir.2005); United States v. Jamison, 416 F.3d 538 , *291 539 (7th Cir.2005); United States v. Lata, 415 F.3d 107, 110-12 (1st Cir.2005); United States v. Scroggins, 411 F.3d 572, 576 (5th Cir.2005); United States v. Duncan, 400 F.3d 1297 , 1308 (11th Cir.), cert. de…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Tamika Wade
See United States v. Rines, 419 F.3d 1104, 1107 (10th Cir.2005) (rejecting a similar due process challenge), cert, denied, — U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 1089 , — L.Ed.2d -, 2006 WL 37744 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Tejada-Calderon
Nevertheless, as the Government argues, “the touching of an individual with a deadly weapon creates a sufficient threat of force to qualify as a crime of violence.” United States v. Dominguez, 479 F.3d 345, 348 (5th Cir.2007); see also United States v. Treto-Martinez, 421 F.3d 1156, 1157-60 (10th Cir.2005), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 126 S.Ct. 1089 , 163 L.Ed.2d 904 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sanchez-Juarez
The record indicates that at no time during the sentencing hearing or when imposing the sentence did the district court refer to the § 3553(a) factors. 6 Both before and after Booker , we have emphasized that “we will ‘not demand that the district court recite any magic words to show us that it fulfilled its responsibility to be mindful of the factors that Congress *1116 has instructed it to consider.’ ” United States v. Mares, 441 F.3d 1152, 1161 (10th Cir.2006) (quoting United States v. Contreras-Martinez, 409 F.3d 1236, 1242 (10th Cir.2005)) (further quotation omitted); see also Un…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rojo-Quintero
United States v. Kelley, 359 F.3d 1302, 1305 (10th Cir.2004) (citations omitted); see also United States v. Rines, 419 F.3d 1104, 1107 (10th Cir.2005) (“It is true that the district court did not march through § 3553(a)’s sentencing factors, but we have never imposed such a requirement.”), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 1089 , 163 L.Ed.2d 905 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Shugars
See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Bromley, 862 A.2d 598, 604 (Pa.Super.2004), appeal denied, 584 Pa. 684 , 881 A.2d 818 (2005), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 1089 , 163 L.Ed.2d 863 (2006); Commonwealth v. Long, 831 A.2d 737, 750 (Pa.Super.2003), appeal denied, 576 Pa. 721 , 841 A.2d 530 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Roberts
See Corchado, 427 F.3d at 821 ; see also United States v. Rines, 419 F.3d 1104, 1107 (10th Cir.2005), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 126 S.Ct. 1089 , — L.Ed.2d — (2006) (recognizing that the district court need not “march through § 3553(a)’s sentencing factors” before we uphold a sentence).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bromley
v.
Pennsylvania
v.
Pennsylvania
No. 05-688.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 9, 2006.
Published
Super. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.