discussed Cited "see" Buckner v. Polk See Moody v. Polk, 408 F.3d 141, 154 (4th Cir. 2005) (no prejudice from counsel’s failure to present more evidence concerning petitioner’s childhood abuse because one expert and two family members testified that the abuse claims were accurate and the prosecution presented no evidence contradicting that testimony), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 1060 (2006).

discussed Cited "see" George Cale Buckner v. Marvin Polk, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina (2×) See Moody v. Polk, 408 F.3d 141, 154 (4th Cir.2005) (no prejudice from counsel’s failure to present more evi dence concerning petitioner’s childhood abuse because one expert and two family members testified that the abuse claims were accurate and the prosecution presented no evidence contradicting that testimony), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 1060 , 163 L.Ed.2d 885 (2006).