discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Nelson See United States v. Jimenez, 513 F3d 62, 81 (3rd Cir 2008), cert den sub nom Abreu v. United States,_US_, 128 S Ct 2460 (2008) (“Nonhearsay use of evidence as a means of demonstrating a discrepancy does not implicate the Confrontation Clause.”); see also United States v. Logan, 419 F3d 172, 177-78 (2nd Cir 2005), cert den, 546 US 1110 (2006) (holding that, under Street, admission of co-conspirators’ alibi statements through testimony of police officer did not violate Sixth Amendment because statements were not used for their truth).