discussed Cited "see" United States v. Micah A. Johnson See United States v. Scott, 413 F.3d 839, 840 (8th Cir.2005) (expressing awareness of disagreement in other circuits, concluding that Leocal involved different category of offenses and was inapposite, and affirming enhancement for prior vehicle-theft conviction based on Sun Bear), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 1091 , 163 L.Ed.2d 906 (2006); Sprouse, 394 F.3d at 581 (panel is bound by prior Eighth Circuit decision unless overruled by court en banc).

discussed Cited "see" United States v. Micah A. Johnson See United States v. Scott, 413 F.3d 839, 840 (8th Cir. 2005) (expressing awareness of disagreement in other circuits, concluding that Leocal involved different category of offenses and was inapposite, and affirming enhancement for prior vehicle-theft conviction based on Sun Bear), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 1091 (2006); Sprouse, 394 F.3d at 581 (panel is bound by prior Eighth Circuit decision unless overruled by court en banc).