discussed Cited "see" Nabors v. Auto Sports Unlimited, Inc. See Ioffe v. Skokie Motor Sales, Inc., 414 F.3d 708 (7th Cir.2005), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 1432 , 164 L.Ed.2d 133 (2006), (holding intent required for private civil action is specific intent to defraud as to mileage in light of Congress’ express purpose); Diersen v. Chicago Car Exchange, 110 F.3d 481 (7th Cir.1997); Ryan v. Edwards, 592 F.2d 756, 760 (4th Cir.1979) (stating that “[b]oth the language of the statute and its history show that it has one purpose: to enable the purchaser of a motor vehicle to know how many miles the vehicle has traveled, as a guide to its safety, r…

discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Larson (2×) Id.; see also United States v. Mussare, 405 F.3d 161, 170 (3d Cir.2005) (reiterating that Chandler “requires an examination of whether the magnitude of reduction [in the witness’ sentence] would likely have changed the jury’s mind regarding[the witness’] motive for testifying” (emphasis added)), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1225 , 126 S.Ct. 1432 , 164 L.Ed.2d 152 (2006).

cited Cited "see, e.g." Salem Management Co. v. Township of Lopatcong See also, e.g., Cashman v. City of Cotati, 415 F.3d 1027 (9th Cir.2005), cert. denied, --- U.S. ---, 126 S.Ct. 1432 , 164 L.Ed.2d 133 (2006).